KTM 390 Adventure vs Yamaha SR400

Compare Specifications of 390 Adventure and SR400

Selected Bikes

KTM 390 Adventure
KTM 390 Adventure

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha SR400
Yamaha SR400

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 373.00 cc 399.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine 4-stroke, air-cooled, SOHC, 2-valves
Engine Starting Electric Kick
Engine Lubrication Wet sump Dry Sump
Clutch PASC™ antihopping clutch, mechanically operated Wet, Multiple Disc
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI
Cooling System Liquid cooling Air Cooled
Maximum Power 42.9 Hp 17.1 kW (23.2PS) @ 6500 rpm
Maximum Torque 37 Nm 27.4 Nm (2.8 kg-m) @ 3000 rpm
Transmission 6-speed Constant Mesh, 5-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Frame Steel trellis frame, powder coated Steel Double Cradle
Chain 520 X-Ring --
Tyres
Front -- 90/100-18M/C 54S (Tube type)
Rear -- 110/90-18M/C 61S (Tube type)
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 320 mm Four-piston radial fixed calliper Hydraulic Disc, Ø 298 mm
Rear 230 mm Single-piston floating calliper Drum
Suspension
Front -- Telescopic forks
Rear -- Dual shock
Colors Available
Colors -- Matt Grey, Yamaha Black


Physical Specs
Length -- 2085 mm
Width -- 750 mm
Height -- 1095 mm
Weight 158 kg 174 kg
Seat Height 855 --
Wheelbase -- 1410 mm
Ground Clearance 200 mm 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14.5 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The KTM 390 Adventure is a powerful and capable motorcycle that is designed for adventure enthu Read More 35 years of excellence and heritage, the Bike which was launched 30 years ago by Yamaha in the Read More
Features -- Tubular high tensile steel semi-double cradle frame
Decompressor and piston position indicator for easy kick starting
Air-cooled 4-stroke single-cylinder engine
Plush front forks and twin shock rear suspension
Retro style with authentic design
Fuel injection for good fuel economy and smooth running
Classic 12-litre teardrop fuel tank
Pros and Cons
Pros - Potent 373 cc engine provides exhilarating performance.
- Robust braking system instills confidence in various conditions.
- PASC antihopping clutch enhances control and smoothness.
- High ground clearance and steel trellis frame make it off-road ready.
- Aggressive yet functional design appeals to adventure enthusiasts.
Retro looks
Cons - Seat height might be challenging for shorter riders.
- The aggressive power output might be overwhelming for novice riders.
- Limited fuel tank capacity could affect long-distance travel.
- The bike's weight could be a factor in less agile handling in certain off-road conditions.
No electric start option
Absence of rear Disc brakes
Tubeless tyres are not included

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9994