Jawa 350 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Metro

Compare Specifications of 350 and Hunter 350 Metro

Selected Bikes

Jawa 350
Jawa 350

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Metro
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Metro

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 334.00 cc 349.00 cc
Engine Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Liquid Cooled, DOHC Single cylinder oil cooled engine
Engine Starting -- Electric
Fuel System Electronic Fuel Injection --
Cooling System -- Oil Cooled
Maximum Power 22.57 ps 20.2 ps @ 6100 RPM
Maximum Torque 28.1 Nm 27 NM @ 4000 RPM
Top Speed -- 115 kmph
Display -- LCD Display
Frame Double Cradle --
Gear Constant Mesh 6 Speed --
Headlamp -- Halogen
Taillamp -- LED
Mileage
Overall Mileage -- 36.5 kmpl
Tyres
Front -- 110/70-17 inch tubeless tyre
Rear -- 140/70-17 inch tubeless tyre
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc 300 mm disc brake
Rear Disc 270mm disc brake
Suspension
Front Telescopic Forks, Ø 35 Mm --
Rear Twin Shock Absorber, Gas Filled Emulsion With 5-step Adjustable Pre-load --
Colors Available
Colors Maroon
Mystique Orange
Black
DAPPER WHITE
DAPPER ASH
DAPPER GREY
REBEL BLACK
REBEL BLUE
REBEL RED


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 184 kg 181 kg
Seat Height 790 800
Wheelbase 1449 mm 1370 mm
Ground Clearance -- 150 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13.2 litres --
Overview
About The Jawa 350, with its 334cc single-cylinder engine and twin exhausts, offers an exciting fusio Read More The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Metro is an impressive motorcycle that offers a combination of sty Read More
Features -- - ON-THE-GO CHARGING
- DUAL CHANNEL ABS
- INTUITIVE ERGONOMICS
- ANALOG SWITCH CUBES
- ALLOY WHEELS WITH TUBELESS TYRES
- DIGI-ANALOG INSTRUMENT CLUSTER

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Metro
Digi-Analog Instrument Cluster

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Metro
Analog Switch Cubes

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Metro
Engine

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Metro
Exhaust
Additional Details Twin Exhaust --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Robust performance backed by strong torque and power
- Excellent fuel efficiency
- Comfortable ergonomics and smooth ride quality
- Impressive blend of classic and modern aesthetics
- Advanced features like on-the-go charging and dual-channel ABS
Cons -- - Some riders might find the bike a bit heavy
- Top speed might not be satisfactory for speed enthusiasts

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5298