Honda CB350RS vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Metro

Compare Specifications of CB350RS and Hunter 350 Metro

Selected Bikes

Honda CB350RS
Honda CB350RS

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Metro
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Metro

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 348.36 cc 349.00 cc
Engine 4 Stroke, SI, BS-VI Engine Single cylinder oil cooled engine
Engine Starting Self Electric
Clutch Multiplate Wet Clutch --
Fuel System PGM-FI --
Cooling System Air Cooled Oil Cooled
Maximum Power 20.7 hp @ 5500 rpm 20.2 ps @ 6100 RPM
Maximum Torque 30 Nm @ 3000 rpm 27 NM @ 4000 RPM
Transmission 5 Speed --
Top Speed -- 115 kmph
Display -- LCD Display
Frame Half Duplex Cradle --
Headlamp -- Halogen
Taillamp -- LED
Mileage
Overall Mileage -- 36.5 kmpl
Tyres
Front 100/90-19M/C 57H 110/70-17 inch tubeless tyre
Rear 150/70-17M/C 69H 140/70-17 inch tubeless tyre
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 310 mm Disc 300 mm disc brake
Rear 240 mm Disc 270mm disc brake
Suspension
Front Telescopic --
Rear Twin-Hydraulic --
Colors Available
Colors Black With Pearl Sports Yellow
Radiant Red Metallic
DAPPER WHITE
DAPPER ASH
DAPPER GREY
REBEL BLACK
REBEL BLUE
REBEL RED


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 181 kg
Seat Height -- 800
Wheelbase -- 1370 mm
Ground Clearance -- 150 mm
Overview
About The Honda CB350RS is a stylish and powerful motorcycle that offers an impressive riding experie Read More The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Metro is an impressive motorcycle that offers a combination of sty Read More
Features -- - ON-THE-GO CHARGING
- DUAL CHANNEL ABS
- INTUITIVE ERGONOMICS
- ANALOG SWITCH CUBES
- ALLOY WHEELS WITH TUBELESS TYRES
- DIGI-ANALOG INSTRUMENT CLUSTER

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Metro
Digi-Analog Instrument Cluster

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Metro
Analog Switch Cubes

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Metro
Engine

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Metro
Exhaust
Additional Details Dual Channel ABS --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Striking design with impeccable finishing
- Comfortable and ergonomic riding position
- Responsive and fuel-efficient engine
- Excellent build quality and durability
- Enhanced stability and maneuverability
- Robust performance backed by strong torque and power
- Excellent fuel efficiency
- Comfortable ergonomics and smooth ride quality
- Impressive blend of classic and modern aesthetics
- Advanced features like on-the-go charging and dual-channel ABS
Cons - Limited color options
- Rear tire width may not appeal to some riders
- Some riders might find the bike a bit heavy
- Top speed might not be satisfactory for speed enthusiasts

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1477