Bajaj Pulsar 150 Classic vs Bajaj V15

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 150 Classic and V15

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 150 Classic
Bajaj Pulsar 150 Classic

Brand:

Model:

Bajaj V15
Bajaj V15

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Engince Displacement 149.00 cc 149.50 cc
Engine Type 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSIV Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC 2 valve, Air cooled, DTS-i
Engine Starting -- Both Electric and Kick Start
Cooling System -- Air Cooled
Maximum Power 14 PS @ 8000 rpm 12 PS @ 7500 rpm
Maximum Torque 13.4 PS @ 6000 rpm 13 Nm @ 5500 rpm
Transmission -- 5-Speed Manual
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed -- 109 kmph
Battery 12 V Full DC Maintenance Free 12V
Ground Clearance 165 mm 165 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 13 litres
Mileage
Overall Mileage 65 kmpl 57 kmpl
Tyres
Front 80/100 - 17 90/90 - 18 51P
Rear 100 / 90 - 17 120/80 -16 60P
Wheelbase 1320 mm 1315 mm
Brakes
Front 240 mm Disc 240 dia disc
Rear 130 mm Drum 130 dia drum
Suspension
Front Telescopic, with anti-friction bush Telescopic
Rear 5 way adjustable, Nitrox shock absorber Twin-Spring loaded hydraulic type- with gas filled
Colors Available
Colors -- Pearl White, Ebony Black


Physical Specs
Width 755 mm 780 mm
Height 1,060 mm 1,070 mm
Length 2,055 mm 2,044 mm
Weight 144 kg 135.5 kg

Overview
About -- Bajaj V15 is made from the scrap metal of India's first aircraft carrier INS Vikrant. This wars Read More
Special Features -- Pumped up fuel tank with frontal mass
Imposing front fascia
33 Dia big front forks
Ergonomic handlebar for wide open chest feeling
Double cradle construction for better rigidity
Fat tyres
Thunderous exhaust
Large disc brake
Bold Sporty graphics
Removable cowl
Classic Led tail Lamp
Premium seats
Premium Instrument panel with color changing led fuel indicator
10 spoke aluminium cast wheel design



Pros and Cons
Pros -- -Most affordable stylish 150cc bike.
-Fuel Efficiency and larger fuel tank.
-Stylish, cafe racer kind of back cowl.
-Wider tyres results in more riding confidence and enhanced looks.
Cons -- -The front and rear portion of this bike doesn't match well enough.
-The design of the headlamp is very odd and dull.
-Limited number of variants to choose from.
-Instrument cluster lacks detailed informations.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name:

Comment:

6653 Enter the numbers here: