Bajaj Chetak Electric vs Bajaj Chetak Urbane

Compare Specifications of Chetak Electric and Chetak Urbane

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Chetak Electric
Bajaj Chetak Electric

Brand:

Model:

Bajaj Chetak Urbane
Bajaj Chetak Urbane

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Range 90 km (IDC as per AIS 040) with a new Battery on a full --
Charging Time 100% Charge in 5 Hours
60-MINUTE Quick Charge (Up to 25%)
5h - 100%
1h - 25%
Engine Starting -- Electric
Maximum Power 4 kW --
Top Speed 60 kmph 95 kmph
Battery Lithium battery Lithium Ion Batteries
Battery Warranty (50000 km, 3 years – Battery Warranty) 3 years for 50000 kms
Headlamp Horseshoe DRL Headlamps LED
Tyres
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front Disc Drum
Rear Drum Drum
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- Solid Colour
Glossy


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Overview
About The Bajaj Chetak Electric is a stylish and eco-friendly scooter that is designed to cater to th Read More The Bajaj Chetak Urbane is an electric scooter that combines performance with sleek and stylish Read More
Features - Steel Body
- IP67 Water Protection
- Flush Fitted Exteriors
- Sequential LED Blinker
- Satin chrome bezel
- Premium Metal Finishes
- Reverse Gear
- Zero Downtime
- Water - Resistant
- Rear LED Sequential Blinkers
Pros and Cons
Pros - Stylish retro design with a steel body.
- Impressive battery range and quick charging options.
- Durable with a substantial vehicle warranty.
- Excellent safety and comfort features.
- Smooth and quiet electric engine.
- Premium and stylish design.
- Reverse gear for easy maneuverability.
- Robust 'Zero Downtime' feature.
- Impressive safety and comfort aspects.
Cons - Top speed might not be sufficient for some highway riders.
- Charging infrastructure can be a concern in some areas.
- Slightly premium price range as compared to the competition.
- Full battery charge time could be improved.
- Drum brakes might not appeal to all riders who prefer disc brakes for more efficient stopping power.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8666