Bajaj Avenger Street 180 vs KTM RC 200

Compare Specifications of Avenger Street 180 and RC 200

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Avenger Street 180
Bajaj Avenger Street 180

Brand:

Model:

KTM RC 200
KTM RC 200

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 180.00 cc 199.50 cc
Engine Single cylinder 4-stroke Single-cylinder, 4-stroke, spark-ignition engine, liquid-cooled
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Start Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Forced oil lubrication with 1 rotor pump
Clutch Wet Multiplate Clutch in oil bath / mechanically operated
Fuel System carburettor --
Ignition -- Contactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment
Cooling System Oil Cooled Liquid cooling system, continuous circulation of cooling liquid with water pump
Maximum Power 15.5 @ 8500 19 kW (25 hp)
Maximum Torque 13.7 @ 6500 --
Transmission 5 Speed 6 speed, claw shifted
Battery 12 V, 4Ah, VRLA --
Frame Tubular Double Cradle Tubular space frame made from steel tubes, powder-coated
Headlamp 55/60 W --
Taillamp Bulb --
Mileage
Overall Mileage 45 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 90/70 - 17 --
Rear 130/90 - 15 --
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 260 mm Disc Disc brake with four-pot brake caliper. Brake discs diameter is 300 mm
Rear 130 mm Drum Disc brake with one-pot brake caliper, floating brake discs. Brake discs diameter is 230 mm
Suspension
Front Telescopic with 130mm Fork Travel WP Suspension 4357
Rear Twin suspension with Nitrox WP Suspension 4618 EM
Colors Available
Colors Ebony Black & Spicy Red --


Physical Specs
Length 2210 mm --
Width 806 mm --
Height 1070 mm 820 mm
Weight 150 kg --
Wheelbase 1480 mm 1,340 mm
Ground Clearance 169 mm 178.5 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13 litres 10 litres
Overview
About The new Avenger Street 180 is the replacement of Avenger Street 150. This younger cruiser gets Read More The KTM RC 200 is a stylish and powerful sports bike that is sure to turn heads. With its sleek Read More
Features -- --

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1351