Suzuki Gixxer SP vs Yamaha FZ-S FI Ver 4.0

Compare Specifications of Gixxer SP and FZ-S FI Ver 4.0

Selected Bikes

Suzuki Gixxer SP
Suzuki Gixxer SP

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha FZ-S FI Ver 4.0
Yamaha FZ-S FI Ver 4.0

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 154.90 cc 149.00 cc
Engine 4-Stroke, 1-Cylinder, Air-cooled, SOHC, 2 Valve Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Engine Starting Electric, Kick Electric Starter
Fuel System Carburettor Fuel injection
Maximum Power 14.8ps@8000 rpm 12.4PS @ 7250 rpm
Maximum Torque 14Nm@6000rpm 13.3 Nm @ 5500 rpm
Transmission 5 Speed, MT Constant mesh, 5-speed
Battery Maintenance free 12V, 3Ah 12V
Display -- Multi-function LCD Instrument Cluster
Seats -- Comfortable Two-Level Seat
Headlamp 12 V 35/35 W Class ( D) Headlight with Position Lamp
Taillamp LED LED Tail Light
Tyres
Front 100/80 - 17 - Tubeless 100/80-17M/C 52P-Tubeless
Rear 100/80 - 17 - Tubeless 140/60-R17
Brakes
Front Disc 282mm Disc Brake
Rear Disc 220mm Disc Brake
ABS -- Single Channel ABS
Suspension
Front Telescopic Telescopic fork
Rear Telescopic 7-Step Adjustable Monocross Suspension
Colors Available
Colors Matte Fibron Grey, Glass Sparkle Black Dark Matte Blue
Matte Black


Physical Specs
Length 2050 mm 2000 mm
Width 785 mm 780 mm
Height 1030 mm 1080 mm
Weight 139 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 136
Seat Height -- 790
Wheelbase 1030 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 160 mm 165 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 13 litres
Overview
About Check the latest & other variants
Suzuki Read More
The Yamaha FZ-S FI Ver 4.0 is a nimble motorcycle powered by a 149cc air-cooled engine with fue Read More
Features -- - Traction Control System
- Y-Connect
- Side Stand engine cut-off switch

Yamaha Fz S Fi Ver 4 0
Pros and Cons
Pros - Balanced performance with good power and torque output
- Stylish design and great build quality
- Excellent ride comfort and handling
- Reliable braking system
- Easy to maintain
--
Cons - Not the most powerful bike in its segment
- Limited color options
- Fuel efficiency could be better
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1374