Suzuki Gixxer 150 vs Yamaha FZ-S FI Ver 4.0

Compare Specifications of Gixxer 150 and FZ-S FI Ver 4.0

Selected Bikes

Suzuki Gixxer 150
Suzuki Gixxer 150

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha FZ-S FI Ver 4.0
Yamaha FZ-S FI Ver 4.0

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 154.90 cc 149.00 cc
Engine 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, air-cooled SOHC, 2 Valve Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Start Electric Starter
Fuel System Carburetor Fuel injection
Cooling System Air Cooled --
Maximum Power 10.4 KW @ 8000 rpm 12.4PS @ 7250 rpm
Maximum Torque 14Nm@6000 rpm 13.3 Nm @ 5500 rpm
Transmission 5 Speed, MT Constant mesh, 5-speed
Top Speed 118 kmph --
Battery 12V 12V
Display -- Multi-function LCD Instrument Cluster
Frame Diamond Type --
Seats -- Comfortable Two-Level Seat
Headlamp 12V 35/35W Class ( D) Headlight with Position Lamp
Taillamp LED LED Tail Light
Mileage
Overall Mileage 63 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 100/80-17-Tubeless 100/80-17M/C 52P-Tubeless
Rear 140/60R-17-Tubeless 140/60-R17
Wheel / RIM Cast --
Brakes
Front Single Disc 282mm Disc Brake
Rear Drum 220mm Disc Brake
ABS -- Single Channel ABS
Suspension
Front Telescopic Telescopic fork
Rear Swing Arm, Mono Suspension 7-Step Adjustable Monocross Suspension
Colors Available
Colors Metallic Oort Gray, Candy Antares Red, Glass Sparkle Black, Metallic Triton Blue, Pearl Mirage White Dark Matte Blue
Matte Black


Physical Specs
Length 2050 mm 2000 mm
Width 785 mm 780 mm
Height 1030 mm 1080 mm
Weight 135 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 136
Seat Height -- 790
Wheelbase 1330 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 160 mm 165 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 13 litres
Overview
About Suzuki Gixxer is the highest selling 150 class motorcycle from the Japanese bike makers, which Read More The Yamaha FZ-S FI Ver 4.0 is a nimble motorcycle powered by a 149cc air-cooled engine with fue Read More
Features -- - Traction Control System
- Y-Connect
- Side Stand engine cut-off switch

Yamaha Fz S Fi Ver 4 0
Pros and Cons
Pros - Impressive mileage of 63 km per litre.
- Robust build quality ensuring durability.
- Aerodynamic and attractive design.
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety.
- Versatile performance for all types of roads.
--
Cons - Absence of a rear disc brake.
- Limited fuel tank capacity of 12 litres.
- No liquid cooling system, reliant on air cooling only.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5107