Royal Enfield Model 180 vs Triumph Tiger 900 Rally

Compare Specifications of Model 180 and Tiger 900 Rally

Selected Bikes

Royal Enfield Model 180
Royal Enfield Model 180

Brand:

Model:

Triumph Tiger 900 Rally
Triumph Tiger 900 Rally

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 770.00 cc 888.00 cc
Engine V-Twin JAP Engine Liquid-cooled, 12 valve, DOHC, in-line 3-cylinder
Clutch -- Wet, multi-plate
Fuel System -- Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection
Cooling System -- Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 6 Bhp 95.20 Ps @ 8750 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 87 Nm @ 7250 rpm
Transmission 2-Speed 6 speed
Riding Modes -- Road, Rain, Sport and Off-Road
Frame -- Tubular steel frame, bolt on sub frame
Tyres
Front -- 90/90-21
Rear -- 150/70R17
Wheel / RIM -- Front Wheel : Spoked Tubeless, 21 x 2.15 in
Rear Wheel : Spoked Tubeless, 17 x 4.25 in
Brakes
Front -- Twin 320 mm floating discs, Brembo Stylema 4 piston Monobloc calipers. Radial front master cylinder, Optimised Cornering ABS
Rear -- Single 255 mm disc. Brembo single piston sliding caliper. Optimised cornering ABS
Suspension
Front -- Showa 45 mm upside down forks, manual preload, rebound damping and compression damping adjustment, 240 mm travel
Rear -- Showa rear suspension unit, manual preload and rebound damping adjustment, 230 mm wheel travel
Colors Available
Colors -- Pure White
Sapphire Black
Matt Khaki Green


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Height -- 1452-1502 mm
Kerb Weight -- 196
Handlebar Width -- 935
Seat Height -- 850-870
Wheelbase -- 1551 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 20 litres
Overview
Features -- - Showa adjustable off-road suspension
- Spoked Tubeless Wheels
- Optimised cornering ABS and traction control
- LED DRL and Indicators
- Cruise Control
- Heated Grips
- 7-inch full-colour TFT instruments
- Handguards
- 4 riding modes
Additional Details -- Exhaust : Stainless steel 3 into 1 header system, side mounted stainless steel silencer
Final Drive : O-ring chain
Swingarm : Twin-sided, cast aluminium alloy
Rake : 24.4 º
Trail : 145.8 mm
Fuel Consumption : 5.2l/100 km (55.4 MPG)
CO2 Figures : BS-VI compliant

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2214