Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Green vs Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Compare Specifications of Classic 350 Redditch Green and Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Selected Bikes

Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Green
Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Green

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue
Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 346.00 cc 346.00 cc
Engine Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, Twinspark, Aircooled Single Cylinder 4 Stroke, Air cooled,
Engine Starting Electric or Kick Kick
Engine Lubrication Wet sump --
Clutch Wet, multi-plate --
Fuel System -- Constant Vacuum Carburettor
Ignition Transistorised Coil Ignition --
Cooling System Air Cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm 19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Maximum Torque 28 Nm @ 4000 rpm 28Nm @ 4000 rpm
Transmission 5 Speed Constant Mesh 5 Speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 1-N-2-3-4-5
Battery 12 volt, 8 Ah --
Frame -- Single down tube
Headlamp 60 W / 55 W, HALOGEN --
Taillamp 21 W / 5 W --
Mileage
City Mileage 37 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 90/90 - 19 90 / 90 - 19
Rear 110/90 - 18 110 / 80 - 18
Wheel / RIM Spoke Spoke
Brakes
Front 280 mm Disc, 2-Piston caliper 280 mm ventilated disc, double piston caliper
Rear 240 mm Disc, Single piston caliper 240 mm ventilated disc, single piston caliper
Suspension
Front Telescopic, 35 mm forks, 130 mm travel 35 mm forks, 130 mm travel
Rear Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80mm travel Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80mm travel
Colors Available
Colors -- Airborne Blue


Physical Specs
Length 2180 mm 2160 mm
Width 790 mm 790 mm
Height 1080 mm 1090 mm
Weight 187 kg 192 kg
Wheelbase 1370 mm 1370 mm
Ground Clearance 135 mm 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13.5 litres 13.5 litres
Overview
About Check the other color variants
Read More
Check the other variant
Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Timeless, elegant design.
- Robust and durable build.
- Comfortable ride with superior suspension.
- Impressive city mileage.
- Suitable for riders of all skill levels.
- Vibrant and unique aesthetic design
- Robust engine with good performance
- Comfortable ride quality with efficient suspension system
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety
Cons - Weight may be a concern for some riders.
- Classic design may not appeal to riders preferring modern aesthetics.
- Absence of liquid cooling system.
- Some riders might find the bike a bit heavy at 192 kg
- Fuel efficiency could be improved for city commute

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

540