Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Blue vs Suzuki DR-Z400SM

Compare Specifications of Classic 350 Redditch Blue and DR-Z400SM

Selected Bikes

Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Blue
Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Blue

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki DR-Z400SM
Suzuki DR-Z400SM

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 346.00 cc 398.00 cc
Engine Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, Twinspark, Aircooled SINGLE CYLINDER, 4-STROKE, DOHC, 4-VALVE, LIQUID COOLED
Engine Starting -- ELECTRIC
Engine Lubrication Wet sump --
Clutch Wet, multi-plate --
Ignition Transistorised Coil Ignition --
Cooling System Air Cooled Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm --
Maximum Torque 28 Nm @ 4000 rpm --
Transmission 5 Speed Constant Mesh 5-SPEED CONSTANT MESH
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 1-N-2-3-4-5
Battery 12 volt, 8 Ah --
Headlamp 60 W / 55 W, HALOGEN --
Taillamp 21 W / 5 W --
Mileage
City Mileage 37 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 90/90 - 19 --
Rear 110/90 - 18 --
Wheel / RIM Spoke Spoke
Brakes
Front 280 mm Disc, 2-Piston caliper NISSIN TWIN-PISTON CALIPER, FLOATING 310MM DISC
Rear 240 mm Disc, Single piston caliper NISSIN SINGLE-PISTON CALIPER, 240MM DISC
Suspension
Front Telescopic, 35 mm forks, 130 mm travel 47 MM SHOWA FORKS, WITH ADJUSTABLE REBOUND & COMPRESSION
Rear Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80 mm travel SHOWA WITH FULLY-ADJUSTABLE COMPRESSION, REBOUND & PRELOAD
Colors Available
Colors -- SOLID BLACK


Physical Specs
Length 2180 mm 2225 mm
Width 790 mm 855 mm
Height 1080 mm 1200 mm
Weight 187 kg 146 kg
Wheelbase 1370 mm 1460 mm
Ground Clearance 135 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 13.5 litres 10 litres
Overview
About Check the other color variants
Read More
--
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Timeless classic design
- Comfortable riding position
- Robust build quality
- Wide service network
--
Cons - Heavier than some competitors
- Lacks modern features like a digital console
- Fuel efficiency could be improved
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

646