Regal Raptor Bobber 350 vs Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Compare Specifications of Bobber 350 and Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Selected Bikes

Regal Raptor Bobber 350
Regal Raptor Bobber 350

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue
Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 320.00 cc 346.00 cc
Engine Water cooled, 4 - stroke twin cylinder , fuel injection Single Cylinder 4 Stroke, Air cooled,
Engine Starting Electric Kick
Engine Lubrication SAE 10 W/40 API SG --
Clutch Oil-bathing multi-plate clutch --
Fuel System Fuel injection Constant Vacuum Carburettor
Ignition CDI --
Cooling System Water Cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 17 kW @ 8500rpm 19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Maximum Torque 22N m @ 6500 rpm 28Nm @ 4000 rpm
Transmission 5 Speed Manual Gearbox 5 Speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed 130 kmph --
Battery 12 V -9 Ah, MF battery --
Frame Metal Frame Single down tube
Headlamp 12 V -35 W / 35W --
Taillamp 12 V -5 W / 21W --
Tyres
Front 90 / 90 x 17 90 / 90 - 19
Rear 130/ 90 x 17 110 / 80 - 18
Wheel / RIM Tubeless Alloy Spoke
Brakes
Front Disc, Dia 300 mm 280 mm ventilated disc, double piston caliper
Rear Disc Dia 240 mm 240 mm ventilated disc, single piston caliper
Suspension
Front Telescopic Hydraulic Shock Absorbers 35 mm forks, 130 mm travel
Rear Telescopic Hydraulic Shock Absorbers Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80mm travel
Colors Available
Colors Black Airborne Blue


Physical Specs
Length 2135 mm 2160 mm
Width 825 mm 790 mm
Height 1140 mm 1090 mm
Weight 165 kg 192 kg
Wheelbase 1085 mm 1370 mm
Ground Clearance 160 mm 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 13.5 litres
Overview
About Launched in 2015, the Bobber 350 is an iconic design from Regal Raptor. The stunning frame work Read More Check the other variant
Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Vibrant and unique aesthetic design
- Robust engine with good performance
- Comfortable ride quality with efficient suspension system
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety
Cons -- - Some riders might find the bike a bit heavy at 192 kg
- Fuel efficiency could be improved for city commute

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8159