KTM 1190 RC8 R Track vs Triumph 2021 Speed Twin

Compare Specifications of 1190 RC8 R Track and 2021 Speed Twin

Selected Bikes

KTM 1190 RC8 R Track
KTM 1190 RC8 R Track

Brand:

Model:

Triumph 2021 Speed Twin
Triumph 2021 Speed Twin

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1195.00 cc 1200.00 cc
Engine 2-cylinder, 4-stroke, spark-ignition engine, 75 V arrangement, liquid-cooled 8 valve, SOHC, 270° crank angle parallel twin
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Clutch -- Wet, multi-plate torque assist clutch
Cooling System -- Liquid cooled
Maximum Power -- 100 PS @ 98.6 PS (73.6 kW) @ 7250 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 112 NM @ 4250 RPM
Transmission 6-speed, claw shifted 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-n-2-3-4-5-6
Riding Modes -- Three riding modes (Rain, Road and Sport)
Display -- Twin dial analogue speedometer and tachometer with LCD multi-functional displays
Frame -- Tubular steel, with steel cradles
Tyres
Front -- 120/70 ZR17
Rear -- 160/60 ZR17
Wheel / RIM -- Front Wheel: Cast aluminium alloy 17” x 3.5”
Rear Wheel: Cast aluminium alloy 17” x 5.0”
Brakes
Front Twin-disc brake with radially mounted four-piston brake calipers; floating brake discs Twin 320mm discs, Brembo M50 4-piston radial monobloc calipers, ABS
Rear Single-disc brake with two-piston brake caliper; fixed brake disc Single 220mm disc, Nissin 2-piston floating caliper, ABS
Suspension
Front -- 43mm USD Marzocchi forks, 120mm travel
Rear -- Twin RSUs with adjustable preload, 120mm rear wheel travel
Colors Available
Colors -- Jet Black
Cranberry
Grey


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Height -- 1097 mm
Weight 173 kg 216 kg
Handlebar Width -- 778
Seat Height -- 809
Wheelbase 1425 mm 1413 mm
Ground Clearance 110 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 16.5 litres 14.5 litres
Overview
Features -- - UPDATED 1200CC HP ENGINE
- CLASS-LEADING HANDLING
Additional Details -- Exhaust: Brushed stainless steel 2 into 2 exhaust system with twin silencers
Final Drive: O ring chain
Swingarm: Twin sided aluminium
Rake: 22.3 º
Trail: 91.5 mm
Fuel Consumption: 5.1 litres / 100 km
CO2 Figures: 116 g/km EURO 5 CO2 emissions and fuel consumption data are measured according to regulation 168/2013/EC

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6156