Kawasaki W175 Street vs Suzuki Gixxer SF SP

Compare Specifications of W175 Street and Gixxer SF SP

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki W175 Street
Kawasaki W175 Street

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer SF SP
Suzuki Gixxer SF SP

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 177.00 cc 154.90 cc
Engine Air-cooled, 4-stroke Single Cylinder 4-Stroke. 1-Cylinder, Air-cooled, SOHC, 2 Valve
Engine Starting Electric Electric & Kick
Engine Lubrication Forced lubrication, Wet --
Fuel System Fuel injection Carburetor
Maximum Power 13 Ps @ 7,500 rpm 14.8ps@8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 13.2 Nm @ 6,000 rpm 14Nm@6000rpm
Transmission 5-speed, return --
Battery -- Maintenance free 12V, 3Ah
Display Digital --
Frame Double Cradle Frame, Steel --
Headlamp -- 12 V 35/35 W
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 80/100 -17M/C (46P) 100/80-17 - Tubeless
Rear 100/90 -17M/C (55P) 140/60R - 17 - Radial Tubeless
Wheel / RIM 17-inches wheels --
Brakes
Front 245 (hydraulic single disc brake) Disc
Rear 110mm (Mechanical drum brake) Disc
Suspension
Front Ø30 mm telescopic fork / 110 mm Telescopic
Rear Hydraulic type dual rating spring shock absorbers, 5way adjustable preload / 64 mm Swing Arm, Mono Suspension
Colors Available
Colors Candy Emerald Green
Metallic Moondust Gray
Matte Fibron Grey, Glass Sparkle Black


Physical Specs
Length 2,007 mm 2050 mm
Width 806 mm 785 mm
Height 1,050 mm 1085 mm
Weight -- 139 kg
Kerb Weight 135.2 --
Seat Height 786.5 --
Wheelbase 1,323 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 152 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12.1 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The Kawasaki W175 Street makes its mark in the lightweight motorcycle segment with a certain un Read More Gixxer SF SP is the limited edition version of the Gixxer SF. This all new motorcycle is loaded Read More
Features - Classic Peashooter-Style Muffler Stylish SP Emblem & Sporty Graphics
Clear Lens LED Tail Lamp
Alluminium Muffler Cover
Smart Digital Instrumentation
Additional Details SOHC, 2 valves --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Excellent power and torque figures
- Comfortable for long rides
- Stylish design and attractive graphics
- Efficient fuel economy
- High-quality build and durability
Cons -- - Might be a bit pricey for some buyers
- Carburetor fuel system may require regular cleaning and maintenance
- Lack of a liquid-cooled engine could be a potential downside for some riders

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4681