Kawasaki W175 Street vs Suzuki Gixxer 150

Compare Specifications of W175 Street and Gixxer 150

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki W175 Street
Kawasaki W175 Street

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer 150
Suzuki Gixxer 150

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 177.00 cc 154.90 cc
Engine Air-cooled, 4-stroke Single Cylinder 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, air-cooled SOHC, 2 Valve
Engine Starting Electric Electric and Kick Start
Engine Lubrication Forced lubrication, Wet --
Fuel System Fuel injection Carburetor
Cooling System -- Air Cooled
Maximum Power 13 Ps @ 7,500 rpm 10.4 KW @ 8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 13.2 Nm @ 6,000 rpm 14Nm@6000 rpm
Transmission 5-speed, return 5 Speed, MT
Top Speed -- 118 kmph
Battery -- 12V
Display Digital --
Frame Double Cradle Frame, Steel Diamond Type
Headlamp -- 12V 35/35W
Taillamp -- LED
Mileage
Overall Mileage -- 63 kmpl
Tyres
Front 80/100 -17M/C (46P) 100/80-17-Tubeless
Rear 100/90 -17M/C (55P) 140/60R-17-Tubeless
Wheel / RIM 17-inches wheels Cast
Brakes
Front 245 (hydraulic single disc brake) Single Disc
Rear 110mm (Mechanical drum brake) Drum
Suspension
Front Ø30 mm telescopic fork / 110 mm Telescopic
Rear Hydraulic type dual rating spring shock absorbers, 5way adjustable preload / 64 mm Swing Arm, Mono Suspension
Colors Available
Colors Candy Emerald Green
Metallic Moondust Gray
Metallic Oort Gray, Candy Antares Red, Glass Sparkle Black, Metallic Triton Blue, Pearl Mirage White


Physical Specs
Length 2,007 mm 2050 mm
Width 806 mm 785 mm
Height 1,050 mm 1030 mm
Weight -- 135 kg
Kerb Weight 135.2 --
Seat Height 786.5 --
Wheelbase 1,323 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 152 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12.1 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The Kawasaki W175 Street makes its mark in the lightweight motorcycle segment with a certain un Read More Suzuki Gixxer is the highest selling 150 class motorcycle from the Japanese bike makers, which Read More
Features - Classic Peashooter-Style Muffler --
Additional Details SOHC, 2 valves --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Impressive mileage of 63 km per litre.
- Robust build quality ensuring durability.
- Aerodynamic and attractive design.
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety.
- Versatile performance for all types of roads.
Cons -- - Absence of a rear disc brake.
- Limited fuel tank capacity of 12 litres.
- No liquid cooling system, reliant on air cooling only.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9665