Kawasaki Ninja 400 vs Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Compare Specifications of Ninja 400 and Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki Ninja 400
Kawasaki Ninja 400

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue
Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 399.00 cc 346.00 cc
Engine Liquid-Cooled Parallel Twin Engine Single Cylinder 4 Stroke, Air cooled,
Engine Starting Electric Start Kick
Fuel System Fuel Injection Constant Vacuum Carburettor
Ignition Digital Ignition --
Cooling System Liquid cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 45 bhp @ 10,000 rpm 19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Maximum Torque 38 Nm @ 8000 rpm 28Nm @ 4000 rpm
Transmission 6-Speed 5 Speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Frame Trellis, high-tensile steel Single down tube
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 110/70R17 M/C 54H 90 / 90 - 19
Rear 150/60R17 M/C 66H 110 / 80 - 18
Wheel / RIM -- Spoke
Brakes
Front Single semi-floating 310 mm Petal Disc with Single balanced actuation dual-piston 280 mm ventilated disc, double piston caliper
Rear Single 220 mm Petal Disc with Dual Piston 240 mm ventilated disc, single piston caliper
Suspension
Front 41 mm Kayaba fork 35 mm forks, 130 mm travel
Rear Bottom-Link Uni-Trak, gas-charged shock with adjustable preload Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80mm travel
Colors Available
Colors Metallic Spark Black, Ebony KRT Edition and Lime Green Airborne Blue


Physical Specs
Length 1990 mm 2160 mm
Width 710 mm 790 mm
Height 1120 mm 1090 mm
Weight 168 kg 192 kg
Wheelbase 1370 mm 1370 mm
Ground Clearance 140 mm 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 13.5 litres
Overview
About Ninja 400 is the answer from Kawasaki's house in response to the much popular KTM RC 390. Kawas Read More Check the other variant
Read More
Features - Kawasaki H2 Inspired Design and Styling
- 8 kg Lesser than Ninja 300
- Nissin ABS
--
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Vibrant and unique aesthetic design
- Robust engine with good performance
- Comfortable ride quality with efficient suspension system
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety
Cons -- - Some riders might find the bike a bit heavy at 192 kg
- Fuel efficiency could be improved for city commute

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5428