Kawasaki KLX 140R F vs KTM RC 125 2020

Compare Specifications of KLX 140R F and RC 125 2020

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki KLX 140R F
Kawasaki KLX 140R F

Brand:

Model:

KTM RC 125 2020
KTM RC 125 2020

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 144.00 cc 125.00 cc
Engine 4st, 1-cyl, SOHC, 2val, Air-cooled 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine
Engine Starting EL. Starter Electric
Engine Lubrication Forced Lub. Wet Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet multi-disc clutch, mechanically actuated
Fuel System Carburetor: KEIHIN PB20 --
Ignition DC-CDI --
Maximum Power 11Ps @ 8,000 min-1 15 HP
Maximum Torque 12 Nm @ 6,000 min-1 (USA/CAN)
12 N-m @ 6,000 min-1 (EUR/IDN/THA)
12 NM
Transmission 5-speed, return 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Display -- LCD
Frame Tubular, semi-double cradle Steel trellis frame, powder coated
Mileage
Overall Mileage -- 41.3 kmpl
Tyres
Front 2.75-21 45M --
Rear 4.10-18 59M --
Wheel / RIM -- 17 inch Orange cast alloy wheels
Front: 110 mm
Rear : 150 mm
Brakes
Front 192 mm Single Disc 300 mm,Four-piston radial fixed calliper, brake disc
Rear 156 mm Single Disc 230 mm,Single-piston floating calliper, brake disc
ABS -- Bosch 9MB Two Channel ABS (disengageable)
Suspension
Front 190mm Telescopic fork WP APEX 43, 120 mm Front Travel
Rear 200 mm Uni Trak Swingarm WP APEX - Monoshock, 150 mm Front Travel
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2,005 mm --
Width 790 mm --
Height 1,135 mm --
Weight 99 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 139
Seat Height 860 820
Wheelbase 1,330 mm --
Ground Clearance 315 mm 178.5 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 5.8 litres 9.5 litres
Overview
About The Kawasaki KLX 140R F makes its mark in the off-road motorcycle category with a 144.00 cc eng Read More Check the latest RC 125 - RC 125 2022 Read More
Features -- - Advanced Aerodynamic Protection
- A1 License
- Lightweight and Precision Crafted Exhaust System
- Triple Clamps
Additional Details -- EMS Bosch : EMS
CO2 Emission : 56 g/km
Steering Head Angle : 66.5 °

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6792