Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition

Compare Specifications of Vitpilen 701 and Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna Vitpilen 701
Husqvarna Vitpilen 701

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 692.70 cc 648.00 cc
Engine Single Cylinder, Liquid-Cooled, 4-Stroke Parallel twin, 4-stroke, single overhead cam, air/oil-cooled
Engine Starting Electric start Electric
Engine Lubrication Forced oil lubrication with 2 oil pumps --
Clutch APTC(TM) Slipper Clutch, Hydraulically Actuated --
Fuel System -- Fuel injection
Ignition Twin Ignition Digital spark ignition - TCI
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Air/oil-cooled
Maximum Power 73.8 Bhp 47 PS @ 7150 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 52 NM @ 5250 RPM
Transmission 6-Speed 6-speed constant mesh
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Battery -- 12 volt, 8 Ah Battery
Frame Chrome Molybdenum Steel Trellis Frame, powder coated Tubular steel frame with bolted trussing
Headlamp -- 12V, H4-60/55W (Halogen)
Taillamp -- 12V, P21/5W
Turn signal lamp 12V, 10W X 4nos
Tyres
Front -- 100/90-18
Rear -- 130/70-18
Wheel / RIM Alloy Spoke
Brakes
Front 320 mm Disc with BOSCH 9M+ ABS 320 mm disc (ABS)
Rear 240 mm Disc with BOSCH 9M+ ABS 240 mm disc (ABS)
Suspension
Front 43 mm WP USD Suspension 41 mm front fork, 110 mm travel
Rear WP Shock Absorber with linkage Twin coil-over shocks, 88 mm travel
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- 2122 mm
Width -- 1165 mm
Height -- 789 mm
Kerb Weight -- 202
Seat Height -- 804
Wheelbase -- 1400 mm
Ground Clearance -- 174 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 13.7 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Accessories -- Sump Guard
Flyscreens
Heel Guards
Brace Pad
Bar end
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Classic design with modern features.
- Robust engine and high torque performance.
- Comfortable seating and ergonomics.
- Quality range of accessories.
Cons -- - Might be heavy for some riders.
- Limited fuel tank capacity for long-distance travel.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4658