Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 vs Suzuki Gixxer 250 BS6

Compare Specifications of Vitpilen 250 and Gixxer 250 BS6

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna Vitpilen 250
Husqvarna Vitpilen 250

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer 250 BS6
Suzuki Gixxer 250 BS6

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 248.80 cc 249.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder, 4-stroke 4-Stroke, 1-cylinder, Oil cooled,SOHC
Engine Starting Electric ELECTRIC
Fuel System -- FI
Cooling System -- Oil cooled
Maximum Power 31 PS @ 9000 RPM 26.5 ps @ 9300 rpm
Maximum Torque 24 NM @ 7250 RPM 22.2 Nm @ 7300 rpm
Transmission 6 Gears 6 Speed, MT
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4--5-6 --
Top Speed -- 145 kmph
Battery 12V 8Ah Maintenance free, 12V 6Ah
Controller 4 V / DOHC with cam levers --
Display Digital Display --
Frame Steel trellis frame, powder coated --
Handle Bar Steel --
Chain 5/8 x 1/4" / X-Ring --
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp -- LED
Mileage
Overall Mileage -- 35 kmpl
Tyres
Front MRF REVZ-D 110/70-R17 110/70R17M/C 54S
Rear MRF 150/60-R17 150/60R17M/C 66S
Wheel / RIM Wheel Front /Rear: Cast aluminium, 3 x 17"; 4 x 17" BRUSHED FINISH ALLOY WHEELS
Brakes
Front ByBre, opposed four piston caliper, brake disc 320 mm /300mm 300 mm Disc
Rear ByBre, single piston, floating caliper, brake disc 230 mm Disc
ABS Two channel Bosch 10.1MB / Bosch 9.1MB DUAL CHANNEL ABS
Suspension
Front WP APEX - USD 43 mm
Travel:142 mm
Telescopic
Rear WP APEX - Monoshock
Travel: 142 mm
Swing arm
Colors Available
Colors Ceramic White Metallic Matte Silver
Metallic Matte Black
Metallic Matte Stellar
Metallic Matte Black No.2


Physical Specs
Length -- 2010 mm
Width -- 805 mm
Height -- 1035 mm
Weight 153 kg --
Kerb Weight 145 156
Seat Height 835 800
Wheelbase 1357 mm 1340 mm
Ground Clearance -- 165 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 9.5 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 is a sleek and stylish motorcycle with a powerful engine displacemen Read More The Suzuki Gixxer 250 BS6 is a powerful and stylish bike with a 249.00 cc 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, Read More
Features - Sturdy, durable and lightweight split-trellis frame
- Upside-down forks
- ByBre brakes
- Bosch ABS system
Controlzone and triple clamp
Controlzone and Triple clamp

LED Lights
Latest LED Lights

Tank and filler cap
Tank and filler cap

Brake
Hydraulic ByBre brake callipers
- Socs – Suzuki Oil Cooling System
- Aggressive Design
- Digital Instrumentation
- Twin Muffler
- Rear Tyre Hugger
- Suzuki Easy Start System
- 41 Mm Large Diameter Front Forks
- Dual Channel Abs With Front And Rear Disc
- Wider Tyre
- Split Seat & Grab Rail

Suzuki Gixxer 250 Bs6
Additional Details Engine Oil: Motorex 15W-50
Primary Drive: 30:80
Final Drive: 15:46
Silencer: Stainless steel/ Aluminium silencer with regulated catalytic converter
Steering Head Angle: 65°
Triple Clamp Offset: 33 mm
Trail: 95 mm
CO2 Emissions:73 g/km / 68 g/km
--
Accessories -- Bumper bracket
Skid plate
Knuckle cover
Tape set tank pad
Terminal, power source (DC socket kit)
Tape set knee grip pad
Saddle bag
Pros and Cons
Pros - Striking minimalistic design that stands out in the crowd.
- Powerful 248.80 cc engine offering exciting performance.
- Superior WP APEX suspension system providing a comfortable ride.
- High-quality ByBre brakes coupled with Bosch ABS ensuring safe braking.
- Durable and lightweight split-trellis frame for better handling.
- Aggressive, eye-catching design
- Superior performance with great fuel efficiency
- Enhanced ride comfort with large diameter forks and split seat
- Comprehensive safety features including Dual Channel ABS
- Reliable and convenient with the Suzuki Easy Start System
Cons - Relatively high seat height might be challenging for shorter riders.
- Limited fuel tank capacity of 9.5 litres reduces range.
- Absence of a reserve fuel gauge can make fuel management tricky.
- May not be suitable for long touring due to its sporty and compact design.
- The ex-showroom price might be steep for budget-conscious buyers.
- Seat may be a bit high for shorter riders
- Top speed may not be sufficient for speed enthusiasts
- The fuel tank capacity could have been larger for long rides

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3195