Husqvarna FS 450 vs Kawasaki Eliminator

Compare Specifications of FS 450 and Eliminator

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna FS 450
Husqvarna FS 450

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki Eliminator
Kawasaki Eliminator

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 449.30 cc 451.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder 4-stroke engine, water-cooled 4-stroke Parallel Twin, DOHC, 8 valves
Engine Starting Electric starter Electric
Engine Lubrication Forced oil lubrication with 2 Eaton pumps Forced lubrication, wet sump
Clutch Adler slipper clutch, hydraulically operated --
Fuel System -- Fuel injection: dia 32 mm x 2
Ignition Contactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment Digital
Cooling System Liquid cooling system, continuous circulation of cooling liquid with water pump Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power -- 45 PS @ 9000 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 42.6 Nm @ 6000 rpm
Transmission 5-speed, claw shifted 6-speed, return
Display -- All-digital LCD instrument panel
Frame Central tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubing Trellis, high-tensile steel
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front -- 130/70-18M/C 63H
Rear -- 150/80-16M/C 71H
Wheel / RIM -- 18” Front / 16” Rear Alloy Wheels
Brakes
Front Disc brake with four-piston radially mounted brake caliper 310 mm disc, Dual-piston caliper
Rear Disc brake with single-piston floating brake caliper 240 mm disc, Dual-piston caliper
Suspension
Front -- 41 mm telescopic fork / 120 mm travel
Rear -- Twin shocks / 90 mm travel
Colors Available
Colors White Metallic Flat Spark Black


Physical Specs
Length -- 2250 mm
Width -- 785 mm
Height -- 1100 mm
Weight 110.5 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 176
Seat Height -- 735
Wheelbase 1495±10 mm 1520 mm
Ground Clearance 310 mm 150 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 7.5 litres 13 litres
Overview
About -- The Kawasaki Eliminator is a motorcycle powered by a 451cc 4-stroke Parallel Twin engine with l Read More
Features -- --
Additional Details -- Rake/Trail: 30° / 121 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7980