Honda CBR 250R vs UM Renegade Duty Ace

Compare Specifications of CBR 250R and Renegade Duty Ace

Selected Bikes

Honda CBR 250R
Honda CBR 250R

Brand:

Model:

UM Renegade Duty Ace
UM Renegade Duty Ace

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.60 cc 223.00 cc
Engine Liquid cooled, 4 stroke, DOHC 4 Valve, SI engine --
Engine Starting Electric start --
Fuel System PGM-Fuel Injection Fuel Injection
Ignition Full-transistor battery ignition --
Cooling System Liquid Cooled --
Maximum Power 26.1 bhp @ 8500 rpm 17 PS @ 8000
Maximum Torque 22.9 Nm @ 7000 rpm 17 NM @ 5000
Transmission 6-speed gear, Constant mesh --
Gear Shift Pattern 1 Down 5 Up --
Top Speed 135 kmph --
Battery 12V-6Ah/ MF ( Maintenance Free ) --
Frame Twin-Spar Type --
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Mileage
Highway Mileage 40 kmpl --
City Mileage 32 kmpl --
Overall Mileage 36 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 110/70 17 120/80/17
Rear 140/70 17 130/90/15
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front 296 mm Disc with ABS
Rear 220 mm Disc with ABS
Suspension
Front Telescopic fork Hydraulic Telescopic
Rear Pro-link Twin Hydraulic with Srping
Colors Available
Colors Sports Red, Matte Axis Gray Metallic with Mars Orange, Matte Axis Gray Metallic with Striking Green and Pearl Sports Yellow --


Physical Specs
Length 2032 mm --
Width 720 mm --
Height 1127 mm --
Weight 167 kg 140 kg
Wheelbase 1367 mm --
Ground Clearance 145 mm 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13 litres --
Overview
About With an additional variant, Repsol, Honda offers something refreshing to the customers to choos Read More --
Features Powerful 250cc engine.
Combined Anti-lock Brake system.
Blue LCD instrument panel.
Integrated sporty cowling.
Comfortable riding position.
Single shock pre-load adjustable rear suspension.
Elegant muffler accentuates the side view.
Wide tubeless tyres.
Stylish tail light.
5 Spoke aluminum cast wheel.
--
Pros and Cons
Pros Performance
Handling
Comfort
Ride quality
--
Cons Tail-lamp looks horrible, should have had a better design
Should have had better built quality
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name:

Comment:

5325 Enter the numbers here: