Honda CBR 250R vs Hyosung GT250RC

Compare Specifications of CBR 250R and Hyosung GT250RC

Selected Bikes

Honda CBR 250R
Honda CBR 250R

Brand:

Model:

Hyosung GT250RC
Hyosung GT250RC

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Engince Displacement 249.60 cc 249.00 cc
Engine Type Liquid cooled, 4 stroke, DOHC 4 Valve, SI engine V2, four-stroke, oil / air-cooled
Engine Starting Electric start --
Ignition Full-transistor battery ignition --
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 26.1 bhp @ 8500 rpm 28 bhp @ 10000 rpm
Maximum Torque 22.9 Nm @ 7000 rpm 22.07 Nm @ 8000 rpm
Transmission 6-speed gear, Constant mesh 5 Speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1 Down 5 Up 1- N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed 135 kmph --
Battery 12V-6Ah/ MF ( Maintenance Free ) --
Frame Twin-Spar Type --
Ground Clearance 145 mm 155 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13 litres 17 litres
Mileage
Highway Mileage 40 kmpl --
City Mileage 32 kmpl --
Overall Mileage 36 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 110/70 17 17 inch
Rear 140/70 17 17 inch
Wheelbase 1367 mm 1435 mm
Brakes
Front 296 mm 300 mm dual-disc brakes
Rear 220 mm 230 mm single disc brake.
Suspension
Front Telescopic fork inverted telescopic suspension
Rear Pro-link hydraulic mono suspension
Colors Available
Colors Sports Red, Matte Axis Gray Metallic with Mars Orange, Matte Axis Gray Metallic with Striking Green and Pearl Sports Yellow --


Physical Specs
Width 720 mm 701 mm
Height 1,127 mm --
Length 2,032 mm 2,090 mm
Weight 167 kg 188 kg

Overview
About With an additional variant, Repsol, Honda offers something refreshing to the customers to choos Read More --
Special Features Powerful 250cc engine.
Combined Anti-lock Brake system.
Blue LCD instrument panel.
Integrated sporty cowling.
Comfortable riding position.
Single shock pre-load adjustable rear suspension.
Elegant muffler accentuates the side view.
Wide tubeless tyres.
Stylish tail light.
5 Spoke aluminum cast wheel.
--



Pros and Cons
Pros Performance
Handling
Comfort
Ride quality
--
Cons Tail-lamp looks horrible, should have had a better design
Should have had better built quality
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name:

Comment:

1457 Enter the numbers here: