Harley Davidson 2022 Nightster vs MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Harley Davidson 2022 Nightster vs MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR

Compare Specifications of 2022 Nightster and Brutale 1090 RR

Selected Bikes

Harley Davidson 2022 Nightster Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Engine Displacement	975.00 cc	1078.00 cc
Engine	Revolution™ Max 975T	Four cylinder, 4 stroke, 16 valve
Engine Starting	Electric	Electric
Clutch	--	Wet, multi-disc with mechanical anti-surging device
Fuel System	Electronic Sequential Port Fuel Injection (ESPFI)	--
Cooling System	--	Cooling with separated liquid and oil radiators
Maximum Power	89 PS @ 7500 RPM	116.5 kW @ 11900 rpm
Maximum Torque	95 Nm @ 5750 RPM	100 Nm @ 10100 rpm
Transmission	--	Cassette style; six speed, constant mesh
Drivetrain	Primary Drive: Gear,:49/89 Ratio Gear Ratios (Overall) 1st : 12.21 Gear Ratios (Overall) 2nd : 9.022 Gear Ratios (Overall) 3rd : 6.994 Gear Ratios (Overall) 4th : 5.641 Gear Ratios (Overall) 5th : 4.731 Gear Ratios (Overall) 6th : 4.131	--
Top Speed	--	265.0 kmph
Battery	--	12 V 8.6 Ah
Display	4" Analog Instrument with Segmented LCD (102 mm) (Analog Display) Vehicle Information on Screen : Total Odometer (Selectable Miles or km), Trip A/B, Gear Position Indication, Fuel Range, 12/24 Hr Clock, Digital Tachometer, Segmented Fuel Level, Ride Mode Indication	--
Headlamp	LED	--
Taillamp	LED	--

Tyres

Front	100/90-19 57H Dunlop™ Harley-Davidson Series Bias Blackwall	120/70 - ZR 17 M/C (58 W)
Rear	150/80B16 77H Dunlop™ Harley-Davidson Series Bias Blackwall	190/55 - ZR 17 M/C (75 W)
Wheel / RIM	Alloy	--

Brakes

Front	--	Double floating disc with Ø 320 mm (Ø 12.6 in.) diameter, with steel braking disc and aluminium
Rear	--	Single steel disc with Ø 210 mm (Ø 8.27 in.) diameter

Suspension

Front	--	Marzocchi “UPSIDE - DOWN” telescopic hydraulic fork with external rebound, compression damping and spring preload adjusters
Rear	--	Progressive, Sachs single shock absorber with rebound and compression (High speed/Low speed) damping and spring preload adjustment

Colors Available

Colors

Vivid Black Gunship gray Redline Red

Graphite metallic/Pearl ice white, Black metallic/Avio grey metallic

Physical Specs

Length	2250 mm	2100 mm
Width	--	780 mm
Height	--	830 mm
Weight	221 kg	183 kg
Kerb Weight	211	--
Seat Height	705	--
Wheelbase	1545 mm	1438 mm
Ground Clearance	110 mm	150 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	11.7 litres	23 litres

Overview

About	Harley-Davidson has officially introduced the Nightster motorcycle in India, priced at 14.99 la Read More	--
Features	- Forward riding position - Mid-mount foot controls - Airbox Cover - Exposed Dual rear Shocks - Ride Modes - Rider Safety Enhancements - Traditional Hoop Style Frame - Revolution Max Engine - Exposed Dual Rear Shocks - LED bullet turn signals - Low and high beam with signature position lighting - Drag-Torque Slip Control System (DSCS) - ABS - TCS Gauges - 4 inch viewable round gauge area analog display with, Speedometer - L/R turn Indication - Coolant Temperature Alert - ABS alert - Fog Lamp Indication - Battery Voltage Alert - High Beam Indicator - Low Fuel Indication - Rear-ABS Disabled Indication - Failure-Indication Alert - Neutral Position Indication - Low Tire Pressure indication - Check Engine Light indication - Oil Pressure Alert - Service Indication	In-line four, four-stroke engine with two maximum power configurations Modular frame with tubular steel trellis section and aluminium plates offering high torsional stiffness Single-sided swingarm with adjustable shock absorber Brakes with radial front callipers Adjustable 8-level traction control and ABS
Additional Details	Rake : 30 Trail : 137 mm Exhaust : 2-into-1; catalyst in header Engine Torque Testing Method : EC 134/2014 Lean Angle, Right (Deg.) : 32 Fuel Economy Testing Method : EU 134/2014 Fuel Economy : 5.1 l/100 km	--

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

3779