Bajaj Pulsar 250 vs UM Renegade Vegas

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 250 and Renegade Vegas

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 250
Bajaj Pulsar 250

Brand:

Model:

UM Renegade Vegas
UM Renegade Vegas

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.07 cc 230.00 cc
Maximum Power 24.5 PS @ 8750 RPM 17 PS
Maximum Torque 21.5 NM @ 6500 rpm 18.1 Nm @ 7000 rpm
Transmission Constant mesh 5 speed --
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 --
Display Infinity Display --
Headlamp Bi functional LED projector headlamp with LED DRLs --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 100/80-17 Tubeless --
Rear 130/70-17 Tubeless --
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 300 mm Disc, Single Channel ABS Disc with ABS
Rear 230 mm Disc Disc with ABS
Suspension
Front Telescopic (37 mm) Telescopic forks
Rear Monoshock with Nitrox Single Hydraulic Shock Absorber
Colors Available
Colors Racing Red
Techno Grey
Caribbean Blue
--


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Kerb Weight 162 --
Seat Height 795 --
Wheelbase 1351 mm --
Ground Clearance 165 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres --
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 250 is a solid option for those in the market for a mid-size motorcycle. With Read More --
Features - Assist & Slipper clutch
- LED Projector headlamp
- Ultra-safe braking in any situation
- Dynamic interplay of premium metallised dual colours
- Crystalline LED tail lamps
- New mono-shock suspension
- New infinity display
- USB mobile charging port
- Smart fuel reading

Console Features
- Gear indicator
- Clock
- Fuel efficiency
- Range indicator
--
Pros and Cons
Pros - Strong performance with a 249.07 cc engine delivering 24.5 PS of power and 21.5 NM of torque.
- Comfortable ride quality ensured by robust suspension setup.
- Impressive safety features including disc brakes with single-channel ABS.
- Wide range of comfort and convenience features like the infinity display and USB charging port.
- Attractive design with premium dual-color options.
--
Cons - 5-speed transmission might limit top-end cruising capability.
- Single-channel ABS might not provide the same level of control as dual-channel ABS.
- The ground clearance of 165 mm, although decent, may not be enough for extremely rough terrains.
- Limited fuel tank capacity of 14 litres could affect long-distance travel.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6017