Bajaj Pulsar 200 SS vs TVS Apache RTR 200 Fi 4V Race Edition 2.0

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 200 SS and Apache RTR 200 Fi 4V Race Edition 2.0

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 200 SS
Bajaj Pulsar 200 SS

Brand:

Model:

TVS Apache RTR 200 Fi 4V Race Edition 2.0
TVS Apache RTR 200 Fi 4V Race Edition 2.0

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 199.00 cc 197.75 cc
Engine Single Cylinder, 4-stroke, Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark SI, 4-stroke, Oil-cooled
Engine Starting Electric start Electric Start
Clutch -- A-RT (Anti Reverse Torque) Slipper Clutch
Fuel System Electronic Fuel Injection Bosch-Closed Loop
Ignition -- Mapped Ignition System
Cooling System Liquid cooled Oil Cooler with Ram Air Assist
Maximum Power 23.2 Bhp @ 9500 rpm 21.0 PS @ 8500 rpm
Maximum Torque 18.3 Nm @ 8000 rpm 18.1 ± 0.5 Nm @ 7000 ± 300 r
Transmission 6-speed (Manual Transmission) 5 Speed Gear Box
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed -- 129 kmph
Battery -- 12V, 9Ah
Frame Pressed steel perimeter beam section frame Double Cradle Split Synchro STIFF
Headlamp -- 60/55W, H4 Bulb with All-Day On LED Position Lamp
Taillamp -- LED 2.5 W
Tyres
Front -- 90/90-17
Rear -- 130/70-17
Wheel / RIM Alloy wheels Alloy
Brakes
Front 280mm Disc Disc (270 mm Petal type)
Rear 230mm Disc Disc (240 mm Petal type)
Suspension
Front 37mm Telescopic Front Fork with Antifriction Bush Telescopic Forks
Rear Nitrox Mono Shock Absorber with piggy back gas canister Mono Tube - Monoshock
Colors Available
Colors -- Black, Grey, Red, White and Matte Black


Physical Specs
Length -- 2050 mm
Width -- 790 mm
Height -- 1050 mm
Weight -- 149 kg
Wheelbase -- 1353 mm
Ground Clearance -- 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 12 litres
Overview
About The 200 SS is a younger brother of the 400 SS, which is yet another Pulsar series of bike that Read More The TVS Apache RTR 200 Fi 4V Race Edition 2.0 is a popular choice among motorcycle enthusiasts, Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Powerful and efficient engine.
- Great handling and comfort.
- Good fuel efficiency.
- Attractive design and colour options.
Cons -- - Limited fuel tank capacity (12 litres).
- Slightly heavier (149 kg) compared to competitors.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9401