Bajaj Pulsar 200 SS vs Bajaj Pulsar 220F BS6

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 200 SS and Pulsar 220F BS6

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 200 SS
Bajaj Pulsar 200 SS

Brand:

Model:

Bajaj Pulsar 220F BS6
Bajaj Pulsar 220F BS6

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 199.00 cc 220.00 cc
Engine Single Cylinder, 4-stroke, Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark 4-stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSVI Compliant, DTS-i FI Engine, Oil cooled
Engine Starting Electric start --
Fuel System Electronic Fuel Injection --
Cooling System Liquid cooled Oil cooled
Maximum Power 23.2 Bhp @ 9500 rpm 20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm
Maximum Torque 18.3 Nm @ 8000 rpm 18.55 Nm @ 7000 rpm
Transmission 6-speed (Manual Transmission) --
Top Speed -- 130 kmph
Battery -- 12V Full DC
Frame Pressed steel perimeter beam section frame --
Headlamp -- Low - projector lamp 55W, High - Ellipsodial lamp 55W, With AHO (Auto Headlamp On)
Mileage
Overall Mileage -- 40 kmpl
Tyres
Front -- 90/90 - 17 Tubeless
Rear -- 120/80 - 17 Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy wheels Alloy
Brakes
Front 280mm Disc 280 mm Disc
Rear 230mm Disc 230 mm Disc
Suspension
Front 37mm Telescopic Front Fork with Antifriction Bush Telescopic, with anti-friction bush
Rear Nitrox Mono Shock Absorber with piggy back gas canister 5 way adjustable, Nitrox shock absorber
Colors Available
Colors -- Black Red
Black Blue


Physical Specs
Length -- 2035 mm
Width -- 750 mm
Height -- 1165 mm
Kerb Weight -- 160
Wheelbase -- 1350 mm
Ground Clearance -- 165 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 15 litres
Overview
About The 200 SS is a younger brother of the 400 SS, which is yet another Pulsar series of bike that Read More The Bajaj Pulsar 220F BS6 is an impressive bike that packs a lot of power under its hood. Its < Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Powerful 220 cc engine delivering punchy performance.
- Robust build quality and aggressive design.
- Comfortable ride and handling with good suspension setup.
- Efficient braking system with front and rear disc brakes.
- Good value for money considering the features and performance.
Cons -- - Lack of modern features like a digital instrument console or Bluetooth connectivity.
- Limited color options available.
- The design hasn't changed much over the years, may feel dated to some.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4762