Bajaj Pulsar 180F Neon vs TVS Apache RTR 180

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 180F Neon and Apache RTR 180

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 180F Neon
Bajaj Pulsar 180F Neon

Brand:

Model:

TVS Apache RTR 180
TVS Apache RTR 180

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 178.60 cc 177.40 cc
Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Air Cooled, DTS-i 4 Stroke
Engine Starting -- Electric & Kick Start
Cooling System Air Cooled --
Maximum Power 17.02 PS @ 8500 RPM 12.52 kW (17.03 bhp) @8500 rpm
Maximum Torque 14.22 Nm @ 6500 RPM 15.5 Nm @ 6500 rpm
Transmission -- 5 Speed
Top Speed -- 124 kmph
Headlamp H7 (12V 55W) --
Taillamp LED --
Mileage
Overall Mileage 50 kmpl 45 kmpl
Tyres
Front 90/90 - 17 - Tubeless 90/90 x 17
Rear 120/80 - 17 - Tubeless 110/80 x 17
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 260 mm disc 270mm Petal Disc
Rear 230 mm disc 200mm Petal Disc.
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush Telescopic Forks, 105 mm Stroke
Rear 5 Way Adjustable, Nitrox Shock Absorber Monotube Inverted Gas-filled shox (MIG) with spring aid
Colors Available
Colors -- White, Black, Grey


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm 2085 mm
Width 765 mm 730 mm
Height 1115 mm 1105 mm
Weight 151 kg 139 kg
Wheelbase 1345 mm 1300 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 165 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 16 litres
Overview
About -- A motorcycle looks nothing special. Built to appear smaller in size. None may see anything spec Read More
Features -- Sculpted Digital Display, have nocturnal blue black lit display & race inspired carbon fibre cues
Beast inspired headlamps, a pair of intense animalistic eyes
Muscled tank, combat wind resistance & aggressively angled tank
RTR engine with 17.03bhp of raw power
Muscled engine cowl having aerodynamic razored design & perpetual motion styling
Roto petal disc brakes with 270mm of brute force brake power &enhanced heat dissipation
Muscled tail cowl of radial race design, lighter-chiselled tail & tricoloured race insignia
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Powerful 177.4cc engine with 17.03bhp.
- Robust braking system with petal disc brakes.
- Unique design with muscled tank and cowl.
- Impressive features like sculpted digital display.
- Decent mileage of 45 km per litre.
Cons -- - May not be the best choice for those seeking a purely city commute bike.
- Some riders may find the aggressive design a bit too sporty for their taste.
- Despite being fuel-efficient for its segment, there are more fuel-efficient bikes in the market.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5659