Bajaj Pulsar 180F Neon vs Suzuki Gixxer SF Fi

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 180F Neon and Gixxer SF Fi

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 180F Neon
Bajaj Pulsar 180F Neon

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer SF Fi
Suzuki Gixxer SF Fi

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 178.60 cc 154.90 cc
Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Air Cooled, DTS-i 4-Stroke, 1-Cylinder, Air-cooled
Engine Starting -- Electric Push Start
Clutch -- Wet Multiplate
Fuel System -- Advanced Fuel Injection Technology
Ignition -- Electronic
Cooling System Air Cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 17.02 PS @ 8500 RPM 14.8 PS
Maximum Torque 14.22 Nm @ 6500 RPM 14 Nm
Transmission -- 5 Speed, MT
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed -- 126 kmph
Battery -- Maintenance free 12V, 3Ah
Headlamp H7 (12V 55W) 12 V 35/35 W
Taillamp LED LED Tail Lamp
Mileage
Overall Mileage 50 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 90/90 - 17 - Tubeless 100/80 - 17 - Tubeless
Rear 120/80 - 17 - Tubeless 140/60R - 17 - Radial Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 260 mm disc Disc
Rear 230 mm disc Disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush Telescopic Fork
Rear 5 Way Adjustable, Nitrox Shock Absorber Swing Arm, Mono Suspension
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm 2050 mm
Width 765 mm 785 mm
Height 1115 mm 1085 mm
Weight 151 kg 140 kg
Wheelbase 1345 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 12 litres
Overview
About -- Check the latest variant
Suzuki Gixxe Read More
Features -- -Fuel Injection Technology
-Compact and Stylish LED Tail Lamp
-Aerodynamic Sports Fairing
-Aluminium Muffler Cover for Low Noise
-Full Digital Instrument Console
-7 Step Adjustable Rear Mono Shock Suspension
-
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Advanced fuel injection technology for better performance.
- Aerodynamic sports fairing enhances fuel efficiency.
- 7-step adjustable rear mono-shock suspension for superior comfort.
- Full digital instrument console for ease of use.
- Reliable and durable build quality.
Cons -- - The seat might be a bit firm for some riders.
- The bike's design might not appeal to everyone.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2146