Bajaj Pulsar 180 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 Fi E100

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 180 and Apache RTR 200 Fi E100

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 180
Bajaj Pulsar 180

Brand:

Model:

TVS Apache RTR 200 Fi E100
TVS Apache RTR 200 Fi E100

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 178.60 cc 197.75 cc
Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 2-Valve, Air Cooled, BSVI Compliant DTS-i Fi Engine SI, 4-stroke, Oil-cooled
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Electric
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection
Cooling System Air Cooled Oil Cooled
Maximum Power 17.02 PS @ 8500 RPM 20.7 hp @ 8500 rpm
Maximum Torque 14.52 NM @ 6500 RPM 18.1 Nm @ 7000 rpm
Transmission -- 5 Speed Gear Box
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed -- 129 kmph
Battery 12V Full DC MF 12V, 9Ah / 8Ah
Frame -- Double Cradle Split SynchroStiff Frame
Headlamp 35/35 W with 2 pilot lamps, With AHO (Auto Headlamp On) AHO 12V, 60/55 W H4 bulb with LED position lamp
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 90/90 17 Tubeless 90/90–17 49P Tubeless
Rear 120/80 17 Tubeless 130/70–17 M/C 62P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 280 mm Disc Brake 270 mm Disc
Rear 230 mm Disc Brake 240 mm Disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush Telescopic Forks
Rear 5 Way Adjustable, Nitrox Shock Absorbe Mono Tube - Mono Shock
Colors Available
Colors Black /Red
Black/Silver
White


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm 2050 mm
Width 765 mm 790 mm
Height 1165 mm 1105 mm
Weight 151 kg 152 kg
Wheelbase 1345 mm 1353 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 180 is a powerful and stylish motorcycle that is suitable for riders who want Read More The TVS Apache RTR 200 Fi E100 is a popular and highly acclaimed motorcycle in its segment. Pow Read More
Features -- - Fully Digital Interactive Speedometer
- Aggressive Tank Cowl
Pros and Cons
Pros - Impressive power and torque figures for spirited performance.
- Excellent braking system for enhanced safety.
- Comfortable suspension setup ideal for various road conditions.
- Good fuel tank capacity ensures fewer fuel stops on long journeys.
- Aggressive and sporty design enhances the overall appeal.
- Powerful and robust engine performance
- Exceptional braking system
- Comfortable ride quality
- Agile handling
- Digital interactive speedometer
Cons - Absence of a liquid cooling system could affect performance in prolonged high-speed rides.
- Lacks some modern features like a digital instrument console and connectivity options.
- The design, though iconic, has remained largely unchanged and could feel dated to some.
- Available only in white
- Fuel tank capacity could have been larger

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

717