Bajaj Pulsar 180 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF SP

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 180 and Gixxer SF SP

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 180
Bajaj Pulsar 180

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer SF SP
Suzuki Gixxer SF SP

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 178.60 cc 154.90 cc
Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 2-Valve, Air Cooled, BSVI Compliant DTS-i Fi Engine 4-Stroke. 1-Cylinder, Air-cooled, SOHC, 2 Valve
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Electric & Kick
Fuel System -- Carburetor
Cooling System Air Cooled --
Maximum Power 17.02 PS @ 8500 RPM 14.8ps@8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 14.52 NM @ 6500 RPM 14Nm@6000rpm
Battery 12V Full DC MF Maintenance free 12V, 3Ah
Headlamp 35/35 W with 2 pilot lamps, With AHO (Auto Headlamp On) 12 V 35/35 W
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front 90/90 17 Tubeless 100/80-17 - Tubeless
Rear 120/80 17 Tubeless 140/60R - 17 - Radial Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 280 mm Disc Brake Disc
Rear 230 mm Disc Brake Disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush Telescopic
Rear 5 Way Adjustable, Nitrox Shock Absorbe Swing Arm, Mono Suspension
Colors Available
Colors Black /Red
Black/Silver
Matte Fibron Grey, Glass Sparkle Black


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm 2050 mm
Width 765 mm 785 mm
Height 1165 mm 1085 mm
Weight 151 kg 139 kg
Wheelbase 1345 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 180 is a powerful and stylish motorcycle that is suitable for riders who want Read More Gixxer SF SP is the limited edition version of the Gixxer SF. This all new motorcycle is loaded Read More
Features -- Stylish SP Emblem & Sporty Graphics
Clear Lens LED Tail Lamp
Alluminium Muffler Cover
Smart Digital Instrumentation
Pros and Cons
Pros - Impressive power and torque figures for spirited performance.
- Excellent braking system for enhanced safety.
- Comfortable suspension setup ideal for various road conditions.
- Good fuel tank capacity ensures fewer fuel stops on long journeys.
- Aggressive and sporty design enhances the overall appeal.
- Excellent power and torque figures
- Comfortable for long rides
- Stylish design and attractive graphics
- Efficient fuel economy
- High-quality build and durability
Cons - Absence of a liquid cooling system could affect performance in prolonged high-speed rides.
- Lacks some modern features like a digital instrument console and connectivity options.
- The design, though iconic, has remained largely unchanged and could feel dated to some.
- Might be a bit pricey for some buyers
- Carburetor fuel system may require regular cleaning and maintenance
- Lack of a liquid-cooled engine could be a potential downside for some riders

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

667