Bajaj Pulsar 180 vs KTM RC 200 2024

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 180 and RC 200 2024

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 180
Bajaj Pulsar 180

Brand:

Model:

KTM RC 200 2024
KTM RC 200 2024

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 178.60 cc 199.50 cc
Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 2-Valve, Air Cooled, BSVI Compliant DTS-i Fi Engine Single Cylinder, Liquid Cooled, DOHC, FI Engine
Engine Starting Electric and Kick --
Engine Lubrication -- Forced, Wet sump
Fuel System -- Bosch Electronic Fuel Injection (EFI)
Cooling System Air Cooled Liquid cooling. Curved radiator with fans for better heat management
Maximum Power 17.02 PS @ 8500 RPM 25 PS @ 10000 rpm
Maximum Torque 14.52 NM @ 6500 RPM 19.2 Nm at 8000 rpm
Battery 12V Full DC MF 12 V, 8 AH MF battery
Display -- LCD Dash display
Frame -- Split-Trellis frame (Tubular)
Headlamp 35/35 W with 2 pilot lamps, With AHO (Auto Headlamp On) LED
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front 90/90 17 Tubeless --
Rear 120/80 17 Tubeless --
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 280 mm Disc Brake 320 mm Disc with Radially mounted calliper
Rear 230 mm Disc Brake 230 mm Disc with Floating calliper
ABS -- Supermoto ABS
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush WP APEX USD forks, 43 mm diameter
Rear 5 Way Adjustable, Nitrox Shock Absorbe WP APEX Monoshock, 10 step adjustable
Colors Available
Colors Black /Red
Black/Silver
Black
Blue


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm --
Width 765 mm --
Height 1165 mm --
Weight 151 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 160
Seat Height -- 835
Wheelbase 1345 mm --
Ground Clearance 165 mm 156 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 13.7 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 180 is a powerful and stylish motorcycle that is suitable for riders who want Read More The 2024 KTM RC 200 has a 199.50 cc engine that's cooled by liquid and runs on fuel injection. Read More
Features -- - Adjustable Handlebars With risers
- Motogp Inspired work
Pros and Cons
Pros - Impressive power and torque figures for spirited performance.
- Excellent braking system for enhanced safety.
- Comfortable suspension setup ideal for various road conditions.
- Good fuel tank capacity ensures fewer fuel stops on long journeys.
- Aggressive and sporty design enhances the overall appeal.
--
Cons - Absence of a liquid cooling system could affect performance in prolonged high-speed rides.
- Lacks some modern features like a digital instrument console and connectivity options.
- The design, though iconic, has remained largely unchanged and could feel dated to some.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3909