Bajaj Pulsar 180 vs Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 2024

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 180 and Pulsar NS 200 2024

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 180
Bajaj Pulsar 180

Brand:

Model:

Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 2024
Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 2024

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 178.60 cc 199.50 cc
Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 2-Valve, Air Cooled, BSVI Compliant DTS-i Fi Engine Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark, 4-Valve FI DTS-i 6-speed
Engine Starting Electric and Kick --
Cooling System Air Cooled --
Maximum Power 17.02 PS @ 8500 RPM 24.5 Ps @ 9750 rpm
Maximum Torque 14.52 NM @ 6500 RPM 18.74 Nm @ 8000 rpm
Battery 12V Full DC MF --
Display -- Digital Instrument Console
Headlamp 35/35 W with 2 pilot lamps, With AHO (Auto Headlamp On) LED `
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front 90/90 17 Tubeless 100//80-17 52 P Tubeless
Rear 120/80 17 Tubeless 130/70-17 62 P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 280 mm Disc Brake 300 mm Disc
Rear 230 mm Disc Brake 230 mm Disc
ABS -- Dual Channel ABS
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush Upside Down Fork
Rear 5 Way Adjustable, Nitrox Shock Absorbe Nitrox Mono shock absorber with canister
Colors Available
Colors Black /Red
Black/Silver
Metallic Pearl White
Glossy Ebony Black
Cocktail Wine Red / White
Pewter Grey / Blue


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm 2017 mm
Width 765 mm 804 mm
Height 1165 mm 1075 mm
Weight 151 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 158
Wheelbase 1345 mm 1363 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 168 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 180 is a powerful and stylish motorcycle that is suitable for riders who want Read More The 2024 Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 has a strong 199.5 cc engine. It's fast, with 24.5 Ps power and 18 Read More
Features -- Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 2024
Digital Instrument Console

Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 2024
LED Lighting

Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 2024
Upside Down Front Fork
Pros and Cons
Pros - Impressive power and torque figures for spirited performance.
- Excellent braking system for enhanced safety.
- Comfortable suspension setup ideal for various road conditions.
- Good fuel tank capacity ensures fewer fuel stops on long journeys.
- Aggressive and sporty design enhances the overall appeal.
--
Cons - Absence of a liquid cooling system could affect performance in prolonged high-speed rides.
- Lacks some modern features like a digital instrument console and connectivity options.
- The design, though iconic, has remained largely unchanged and could feel dated to some.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7457