Bajaj Pulsar 180 vs Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 2024

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 180 and Pulsar NS 160 2024

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 180
Bajaj Pulsar 180

Brand:

Model:

Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 2024
Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 2024

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 178.60 cc 160.30 cc
Engine 4 - stroke, SOHC 2-Valve, Air Cooled, BSVI Compliant DTS-i Fi Engine Oil Cooled, Twin Spark, 4-Valve FI DTS-i Engine
Engine Starting Electric and Kick --
Cooling System Air Cooled --
Maximum Power 17.02 PS @ 8500 RPM 17.2 Ps @ 9000 rpm
Maximum Torque 14.52 NM @ 6500 RPM 14.6 Nm @ 7250 rpm
Battery 12V Full DC MF DC, 12V, 8Ah VRLA
Headlamp 35/35 W with 2 pilot lamps, With AHO (Auto Headlamp On) LED
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 90/90 17 Tubeless 100/80-17 52 P Tubeless
Rear 120/80 17 Tubeless 130/70-17 62 P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 280 mm Disc Brake Dual Channel ABS, 300 mm Disc
Rear 230 mm Disc Brake 230 mm Disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic with Anti Friction Bush Up Side Down Fork
Rear 5 Way Adjustable, Nitrox Shock Absorbe Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister
Colors Available
Colors Black /Red
Black/Silver
--


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm 2017 mm
Width 765 mm 804 mm
Height 1165 mm 1060 mm
Weight 151 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 152
Wheelbase 1345 mm 1372 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 170 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 180 is a powerful and stylish motorcycle that is suitable for riders who want Read More The 2024 Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 flaunts a 160.30 cc oil-cooled, twin-spark, 4-valve FI DTS-i engin Read More
Features -- Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 2024
LED Lighting

Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 2024
Aggressive muscular stylin
Pros and Cons
Pros - Impressive power and torque figures for spirited performance.
- Excellent braking system for enhanced safety.
- Comfortable suspension setup ideal for various road conditions.
- Good fuel tank capacity ensures fewer fuel stops on long journeys.
- Aggressive and sporty design enhances the overall appeal.
--
Cons - Absence of a liquid cooling system could affect performance in prolonged high-speed rides.
- Lacks some modern features like a digital instrument console and connectivity options.
- The design, though iconic, has remained largely unchanged and could feel dated to some.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4482