Bajaj Pulsar 150 vs Yamaha FZ-S FI Ver 4.0

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 150 and FZ-S FI Ver 4.0

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 150
Bajaj Pulsar 150

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha FZ-S FI Ver 4.0
Yamaha FZ-S FI Ver 4.0

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 149.50 cc 149.00 cc
Engine 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSVI Compliant DTS-i FI Engine Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Electric Starter
Fuel System -- Fuel injection
Maximum Power 14 PS @ 8500 RPM 12.4PS @ 7250 rpm
Maximum Torque 13.25 NM @ 6500 RPM 13.3 Nm @ 5500 rpm
Transmission -- Constant mesh, 5-speed
Battery 12V Full DC 12V
Display -- Multi-function LCD Instrument Cluster
Seats -- Comfortable Two-Level Seat
Headlamp 35/35 W with 2 pilot lamps, With AHO (Auto Headlamp On) Class ( D) Headlight with Position Lamp
Taillamp LED LED Tail Light
Tyres
Front 80/100 17 Tubeless 100/80-17M/C 52P-Tubeless
Rear 100 / 90 17 Tubeless 140/60-R17
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front ABS, 260 mm Disc 282mm Disc Brake
Rear 130mm Dia. Drum 220mm Disc Brake
ABS -- Single Channel ABS
Suspension
Front Telescopic, 31mm Conventional fork Telescopic fork
Rear Twin Shock absorber, Gas filled with Canister 7-Step Adjustable Monocross Suspension
Colors Available
Colors Black/Grey
Black /Red
Dark Matte Blue
Matte Black


Physical Specs
Length 2055 mm 2000 mm
Width 765 mm 780 mm
Height -- 1080 mm
Weight 148 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 136
Seat Height -- 790
Wheelbase 1320 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 165 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 13 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 150 is a popular motorcycle that has been on the market for many years. With i Read More The Yamaha FZ-S FI Ver 4.0 is a nimble motorcycle powered by a 149cc air-cooled engine with fue Read More
Features -- - Traction Control System
- Y-Connect
- Side Stand engine cut-off switch

Yamaha Fz S Fi Ver 4 0
Pros and Cons
Pros - Robust and reliable 149.50 cc, BSVI-compliant DTS-i FI engine.
- Sporty and stylish aesthetics.
- Respectable fuel economy with a 15-litre tank capacity.
- Excellent suspension system for a comfortable ride on varied terrains.
- ABS 260mm disc front brake for reliable and safe stopping power.
- Reasonably priced for the features it offers.
--
Cons - Rear drum brake instead of disc could be a potential downside for some riders.
- Lack of a digital instrument cluster which is becoming standard in this segment.
- Despite the robust engine, top-end performance could be better.
- Limited colour options.
- Absence of a sixth gear may affect long highway rides.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1058