Bajaj Pulsar 150 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF SP

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 150 and Gixxer SF SP

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 150
Bajaj Pulsar 150

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer SF SP
Suzuki Gixxer SF SP

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 149.50 cc 154.90 cc
Engine 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSVI Compliant DTS-i FI Engine 4-Stroke. 1-Cylinder, Air-cooled, SOHC, 2 Valve
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Electric & Kick
Fuel System -- Carburetor
Maximum Power 14 PS @ 8500 RPM 14.8ps@8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 13.25 NM @ 6500 RPM 14Nm@6000rpm
Battery 12V Full DC Maintenance free 12V, 3Ah
Headlamp 35/35 W with 2 pilot lamps, With AHO (Auto Headlamp On) 12 V 35/35 W
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front 80/100 17 Tubeless 100/80-17 - Tubeless
Rear 100 / 90 17 Tubeless 140/60R - 17 - Radial Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front ABS, 260 mm Disc Disc
Rear 130mm Dia. Drum Disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic, 31mm Conventional fork Telescopic
Rear Twin Shock absorber, Gas filled with Canister Swing Arm, Mono Suspension
Colors Available
Colors Black/Grey
Black /Red
Matte Fibron Grey, Glass Sparkle Black


Physical Specs
Length 2055 mm 2050 mm
Width 765 mm 785 mm
Height -- 1085 mm
Weight 148 kg 139 kg
Wheelbase 1320 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 150 is a popular motorcycle that has been on the market for many years. With i Read More Gixxer SF SP is the limited edition version of the Gixxer SF. This all new motorcycle is loaded Read More
Features -- Stylish SP Emblem & Sporty Graphics
Clear Lens LED Tail Lamp
Alluminium Muffler Cover
Smart Digital Instrumentation
Pros and Cons
Pros - Robust and reliable 149.50 cc, BSVI-compliant DTS-i FI engine.
- Sporty and stylish aesthetics.
- Respectable fuel economy with a 15-litre tank capacity.
- Excellent suspension system for a comfortable ride on varied terrains.
- ABS 260mm disc front brake for reliable and safe stopping power.
- Reasonably priced for the features it offers.
- Excellent power and torque figures
- Comfortable for long rides
- Stylish design and attractive graphics
- Efficient fuel economy
- High-quality build and durability
Cons - Rear drum brake instead of disc could be a potential downside for some riders.
- Lack of a digital instrument cluster which is becoming standard in this segment.
- Despite the robust engine, top-end performance could be better.
- Limited colour options.
- Absence of a sixth gear may affect long highway rides.
- Might be a bit pricey for some buyers
- Carburetor fuel system may require regular cleaning and maintenance
- Lack of a liquid-cooled engine could be a potential downside for some riders

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2543