Bajaj Pulsar 125 Split Seat vs Royal Touch Storm 125

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 125 Split Seat and Storm 125

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 125 Split Seat
Bajaj Pulsar 125 Split Seat

Brand:

Model:

Royal Touch Storm 125
Royal Touch Storm 125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.40 cc 124.60 cc
Engine 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSVI Compliant DTS-i Engine Water-cooling lie type engine, single cylinder, 4 stroke
Engine Starting Electric or Kick Start --
Fuel System Fuel injection --
Ignition Twin Spark --
Maximum Power 11.8 PS @ 8500 RPM 9.0 kw @ 9000 rpm
Maximum Torque 10.8 NM @ 6500 RPM 9.0 N.m @ 7500 rpm
Transmission 5-speed --
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 --
Top Speed -- 90 kmph
Battery 12V Full DC MF 12V 7A
Seats Split Seat Ensure Maximum Comfort --
Headlamp 35 W Low/High Beam --
Tyres
Front 80/100 x 17 Tubeless 110/90-16
Rear 100/90 x 17 Tubeless 130/90-15
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 240 mm Disc/130 mm Drum Disc
Rear 130 mm Drum Drum
Suspension
Front Telescopic with anti-friction bushes --
Rear Twin Gas Shock, Nitrox Rear shock absorber --
Colors Available
Colors Black Red
Black Silver
Black


Physical Specs
Length 2042 mm 2225 mm
Width 765 mm 790 mm
Height 1060 mm 1100 mm
Weight -- 155 kg
Kerb Weight 142 --
Seat Height 790 --
Wheelbase 1320 mm --
Ground Clearance 165 mm 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11.5 litres 13 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 125 Split Seat is a stylish and comfortable motorcycle with a powerful engine Read More --
Features - Sporty Design
- First-in-class Split Seat
- First-in-class Split Grab Rails
- Nitrox Rear shock absorber
- Anti-Skid Braking Technology
--
Pros and Cons
Pros - Sporty and sleek design with first-in-class features such as Split Seat and Split Grab Rails.
- Smooth and responsive 124.4 cc Twin Spark DTS-i Engine with a balanced power output.
- Excellent handling with Telescopic front and Nitrox rear suspension.
- Anti-skid braking technology ensures secure stopping power.
- Good fuel efficiency and comfortable ride quality.
- Attractive pricing for the features offered.
--
Cons - Lack of a disc brake option at the rear for improved braking performance.
- Limited color options might not appeal to all consumers.
- The bike might feel underpowered for some riders, especially on highways.
- Absence of LED lighting might disappoint modern tech enthusiasts.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5507