Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6 vs UM Renegade Scrambler Classic

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 125 Neon BS6 and Renegade Scrambler Classic

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6
Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6

Brand:

Model:

UM Renegade Scrambler Classic
UM Renegade Scrambler Classic

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.40 cc 124.20 cc
Engine 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSVI Compliant DTS-i Engine Liquid Cooled, Euro IV
Engine Starting -- Kick start + Self start
Fuel System -- MARELLI EFI
Ignition -- CDI
Cooling System -- Liquid Cooling
Maximum Power 12 PS @ 8500 rpm 14.75 bhp @ 10500 rpm
Maximum Torque 11 Nm @ 6500 rpm 10.9 Nm @ 8250 rpm
Transmission -- 5- speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed 112 kmph --
Battery 12V Full DC MF --
Headlamp HS1 (12V 35/35W) --
Mileage
Overall Mileage 50 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 80/100 x 17 Tubeless 100/80-17
Rear 100/90 x 17 Tubeless 130/70-17
Wheel / RIM Alloy Spoke
Brakes
Front 240 mm Disc / 170 mm Drum 300 mm Hydraulic Single Wave Disc
Rear 130 mm Drum 220 mm Hydraulic Single Wave Disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic Hydraulic Telescopic: 110mm / Diam 40mm
Rear Twin Gas Shock Monoshock with adjustable preload 130 mm travel
Colors Available
Colors Platinum Silver
Solar Red
Neon Blue
Orange, Classic Green and Classic Black


Physical Specs
Length 2055 mm 2006 mm
Width 755 mm 810 mm
Height 1060 mm 1350 mm
Weight -- 124 kg
Kerb Weight 140 --
Wheelbase 1320 mm 1335 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 10.8 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6 is a budget-friendly motorcycle that is designed for city riding. Read More --
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Powerful and eco-friendly BS6 compliant engine.
- Reliable braking system offering efficient stopping power.
- Lightweight alloy wheels with tubeless tyres for better grip and stability.
- Durable and comfortable chassis and suspension for a smooth ride.
- Sufficient fuel tank capacity of 15 litres for extended rides.
- Affordable price point for the features offered.
--
Cons - The drum brake at the rear could be upgraded to a disc brake for improved braking.
- Power might seem less to some riders, especially on highways.
- Absence of a digital instrument cluster could be a drawback for tech-savvy riders.
- The design could be a bit dated for those seeking a modern aesthetic.
- Lacks some of the advanced features present in competitors at a similar price point.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9106