Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6 vs Kawasaki KLX 140R F

Compare Specifications of Pulsar 125 Neon BS6 and KLX 140R F

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6
Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki KLX 140R F
Kawasaki KLX 140R F

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.40 cc 144.00 cc
Engine 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSVI Compliant DTS-i Engine 4st, 1-cyl, SOHC, 2val, Air-cooled
Engine Starting -- EL. Starter
Engine Lubrication -- Forced Lub. Wet
Fuel System -- Carburetor: KEIHIN PB20
Ignition -- DC-CDI
Maximum Power 12 PS @ 8500 rpm 11Ps @ 8,000 min-1
Maximum Torque 11 Nm @ 6500 rpm 12 Nm @ 6,000 min-1 (USA/CAN)
12 N-m @ 6,000 min-1 (EUR/IDN/THA)
Transmission -- 5-speed, return
Top Speed 112 kmph --
Battery 12V Full DC MF --
Frame -- Tubular, semi-double cradle
Headlamp HS1 (12V 35/35W) --
Mileage
Overall Mileage 50 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 80/100 x 17 Tubeless 2.75-21 45M
Rear 100/90 x 17 Tubeless 4.10-18 59M
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 240 mm Disc / 170 mm Drum 192 mm Single Disc
Rear 130 mm Drum 156 mm Single Disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic 190mm Telescopic fork
Rear Twin Gas Shock 200 mm Uni Trak Swingarm
Colors Available
Colors Platinum Silver
Solar Red
Neon Blue
--


Physical Specs
Length 2055 mm 2,005 mm
Width 755 mm 790 mm
Height 1060 mm 1,135 mm
Weight -- 99 kg
Kerb Weight 140 --
Seat Height -- 860
Wheelbase 1320 mm 1,330 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 315 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 5.8 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj Pulsar 125 Neon BS6 is a budget-friendly motorcycle that is designed for city riding. Read More The Kawasaki KLX 140R F makes its mark in the off-road motorcycle category with a 144.00 cc eng Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Powerful and eco-friendly BS6 compliant engine.
- Reliable braking system offering efficient stopping power.
- Lightweight alloy wheels with tubeless tyres for better grip and stability.
- Durable and comfortable chassis and suspension for a smooth ride.
- Sufficient fuel tank capacity of 15 litres for extended rides.
- Affordable price point for the features offered.
--
Cons - The drum brake at the rear could be upgraded to a disc brake for improved braking.
- Power might seem less to some riders, especially on highways.
- Absence of a digital instrument cluster could be a drawback for tech-savvy riders.
- The design could be a bit dated for those seeking a modern aesthetic.
- Lacks some of the advanced features present in competitors at a similar price point.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2908