Bajaj Dominar 400 Disc vs KTM 390 Adventure

Compare Specifications of Dominar 400 Disc and 390 Adventure

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Dominar 400 Disc
Bajaj Dominar 400 Disc

Brand:

Model:

KTM 390 Adventure
KTM 390 Adventure

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 373.30 cc 373.00 cc
Engine Triple spark 4-valve DTS-i engine, closed fuel injection, liquid cooled 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine
Engine Starting Kick Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch Slipper clutch PASC™ antihopping clutch, mechanically operated
Cooling System Liquid Cooling Liquid cooling
Maximum Power 35 PS @ 8000 rpm 42.9 Hp
Maximum Torque 35 Nm @ 6500 rpm 37 Nm
Transmission 6 speed 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Battery 12V, 8Ah VRLA --
Frame Beam type perimeter frame Steel trellis frame, powder coated
Chain -- 520 X-Ring
Headlamp Full LED with Auto Headlamp On (AHO) --
Mileage
Overall Mileage 27 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 110/70-17 Radial --
Rear 150/60-17 Radial --
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc 320 mm Four-piston radial fixed calliper
Rear Disc 230 mm Single-piston floating calliper
Suspension
Front 43mm forks ,Telescopic --
Rear Multi-step adjustable mono shock --
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2156 mm --
Width 813 mm --
Height 1112 mm --
Weight 182 kg 158 kg
Seat Height -- 855
Wheelbase 1453 mm --
Ground Clearance 157 mm 200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13 litres 14.5 litres
Overview
About Check the newer variants of Bajaj Dominar 400
Read More
The KTM 390 Adventure is a powerful and capable motorcycle that is designed for adventure enthu Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Potent 373 cc engine provides exhilarating performance.
- Robust braking system instills confidence in various conditions.
- PASC antihopping clutch enhances control and smoothness.
- High ground clearance and steel trellis frame make it off-road ready.
- Aggressive yet functional design appeals to adventure enthusiasts.
Cons -- - Seat height might be challenging for shorter riders.
- The aggressive power output might be overwhelming for novice riders.
- Limited fuel tank capacity could affect long-distance travel.
- The bike's weight could be a factor in less agile handling in certain off-road conditions.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

900