Bajaj CT110 KS BS6 vs Hero Passion Pro BS6

Compare Specifications of CT110 KS BS6 and Passion Pro BS6

Selected Bikes

Bajaj CT110 KS BS6
Bajaj CT110 KS BS6

Brand:

Model:

Hero Passion Pro BS6
Hero Passion Pro BS6

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 115.45 cc 110.00 cc
Engine 4 Stroke, Single Cylinder Air cooled 4 stroke
Engine Starting Kick start Self (with i3s) & Kick
Clutch -- Wet Multi Plate
Fuel System Electronic Injection --
Cooling System -- Air cooled
Maximum Power 8.6 PS @ 7000 rpm 9.02 PS @ 7500 rpm
Maximum Torque 9.81 Nm @ 5000 rpm 9.79 Nm @ 5000 rpm
Transmission 4 Speed (All Down Shift) Constant Mesh
Top Speed -- 100 kmph
Battery -- 3Ah MF
Display -- Digi analogue console
Frame Tubular single down tube with lower cradle frame Diamond
Saddle Saddle height : 812 mm --
Headlamp 12V, 35/35W, HS1
LED Daytime Running Lights (DRL)
--
Mileage
Overall Mileage -- 75 kmpl
Tyres
Front 2.75 X 17, 41 P - Tube Type, Semi-knobby 80/100-18
Rear 3.00 X 17, 50 P - Tube Type, Semi-knobby 80/100-18
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 130 mm Drum 240 mm Disc/ 130 mm Drum
Rear 110 mm Drum with CBS 130 mm Drum
Suspension
Front Hydraulic telescopic, 125 mm Travel 30 mm Conventional fork
Rear 100 mm wheel travel, SNS suspension Twin shox
Colors Available
Colors Gloss Flame Red with Bright Red Decals
Matte Olive Green with Yellow Decals
Gloss Ebony Black with Blue Decals
Glaze Black
Sports Red
Moon Yellow
Heavy Grey Metallic
Techno Blue


Physical Specs
Length 1945 mm 2036 mm
Width 752 mm 715 mm
Height 1072 mm 1113 mm
Weight 117 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 117
Wheelbase 1235 mm 1270 mm
Ground Clearance 170 mm 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 10.5 litres 10 litres
Overview
About The Bajaj CT110 KS BS6 is a sturdy motorcycle with a well-designed frame that provides good sta Read More The Hero Passion Pro BS6 is a stylish and reliable bike that is perfect for daily commutes and Read More
Features Kadak Semi-knobby Tyres - New 110c Engine with higher Torque on-demand
- Muscular Tank with Triple tone Graphics
- Autosail - Smoother Ride in City Traffic
- Signature Tail Lamp
- Brighter Headlamp
- Digi-Analogue Console
- Muffler Cover
- Longer Front Suspension Travel
Additional Details -- Width : 715 mm (Drum), 739 mm (Disc)
Saddle Height : 799
Kerb Weight : 117kg (Drum), 118kg (Disc)
240 mm front disc brake variant is priced at ₹ 67190.
Pros and Cons
Pros - Economically priced making it an affordable option for many buyers.
- Fuel-efficient 115.45 cc engine, reducing running costs.
- Solid build quality ensuring durability and longevity.
- Comfortable riding experience thanks to effective suspension setup.
- Compact dimensions and lightweight for easy manoeuvrability in traffic.
- Semi-knobby tyres providing good road grip.
- Available in attractive colour options enhancing the aesthetic appeal.
- High fuel efficiency of 75 km per litre, ideal for daily commuting.
- Autosail technology for smoother city riding and i3s technology for enhanced fuel efficiency.
- Digi-analogue console provides comprehensive ride information.
- Muscular design with stylish triple-tone graphics and various colour options.
- Competitive pricing for the features offered.
Cons - Lacks a disc brake option which could have improved stopping power.
- Kick start feature may be inconvenient for some, as compared to an electric start.
- Engine performance might not be suitable for high-speed highway use.
- The all downshift 4-speed gearbox might take some getting used to.
- Absence of modern features such as a digital instrument console.
- The seat could be more comfortable for long journeys.
- Limited tank capacity might require frequent refuelling on longer rides.
- Power and torque could be inadequate for those seeking sporty performance.
- Lacks advanced safety features such as Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS).
- Seat comfort could be improved for long journeys.
- Drum brake variant may offer less stopping power compared to the disc brake variant.
- No LED lighting for headlamp and tail lamp.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

619