Bajaj CT110 KS BS6 vs Gapuchee Motocross 125

Compare Specifications of CT110 KS BS6 and Motocross 125

Selected Bikes

Bajaj CT110 KS BS6
Bajaj CT110 KS BS6

Brand:

Model:

Gapuchee Motocross 125
Gapuchee Motocross 125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 115.45 cc 125.00 cc
Engine 4 Stroke, Single Cylinder Air-cooled, single cylinder 4-stroke
Engine Starting Kick start Electric
Fuel System Electronic Injection --
Maximum Power 8.6 PS @ 7000 rpm 9 HP @ 7500 RPM
Maximum Torque 9.81 Nm @ 5000 rpm 9.5 NM @ 5000 RPM
Load Carrying Capacity -- 150 kgs
Transmission 4 Speed (All Down Shift) Chain
Drivetrain -- Automatic
Top Speed -- 85 kmph
Frame Tubular single down tube with lower cradle frame --
Saddle Saddle height : 812 mm --
Headlamp 12V, 35/35W, HS1
LED Daytime Running Lights (DRL)
--
Mileage
Overall Mileage -- 60 kmpl
Tyres
Front 2.75 X 17, 41 P - Tube Type, Semi-knobby 70×100 -17
Rear 3.00 X 17, 50 P - Tube Type, Semi-knobby 90×100-14
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 130 mm Drum Hydraulic Disc
Rear 110 mm Drum with CBS Hydraulic Disc
Suspension
Front Hydraulic telescopic, 125 mm Travel --
Rear 100 mm wheel travel, SNS suspension --
Colors Available
Colors Gloss Flame Red with Bright Red Decals
Matte Olive Green with Yellow Decals
Gloss Ebony Black with Blue Decals
BLUE
WHITE
YELLOW
ORANGE
RED


Physical Specs
Length 1945 mm --
Width 752 mm --
Height 1072 mm --
Weight 117 kg 67 kg
Kerb Weight -- 56
Seat Height -- 800
Wheelbase 1235 mm 1200 mm
Ground Clearance 170 mm 260 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 10.5 litres --
Overview
About The Bajaj CT110 KS BS6 is a sturdy motorcycle with a well-designed frame that provides good sta Read More --
Features Kadak Semi-knobby Tyres - Fast speed
- High efficiency
- Less fuel consumption
Additional Details -- Carton sizes: 1480x380x700mm
Absorber (Front/Rear): Fork absorber / Shock absorber
Pros and Cons
Pros - Economically priced making it an affordable option for many buyers.
- Fuel-efficient 115.45 cc engine, reducing running costs.
- Solid build quality ensuring durability and longevity.
- Comfortable riding experience thanks to effective suspension setup.
- Compact dimensions and lightweight for easy manoeuvrability in traffic.
- Semi-knobby tyres providing good road grip.
- Available in attractive colour options enhancing the aesthetic appeal.
--
Cons - Lacks a disc brake option which could have improved stopping power.
- Kick start feature may be inconvenient for some, as compared to an electric start.
- Engine performance might not be suitable for high-speed highway use.
- The all downshift 4-speed gearbox might take some getting used to.
- Absence of modern features such as a digital instrument console.
- The seat could be more comfortable for long journeys.
- Limited tank capacity might require frequent refuelling on longer rides.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4153