Aprilia Tuono 125 vs Bajaj CT110 KS BS6

Compare Specifications of Tuono 125 and CT110 KS BS6

Selected Bikes

Aprilia Tuono 125
Aprilia Tuono 125

Brand:

Model:

Bajaj CT110 KS BS6
Bajaj CT110 KS BS6

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.20 cc 115.45 cc
Engine Single cylinder, 4-stroke, liquid cooled electronic injection, 4 valves 4 Stroke, Single Cylinder
Engine Starting -- Kick start
Fuel System -- Electronic Injection
Cooling System Liquid cooling --
Maximum Power -- 8.6 PS @ 7000 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 9.81 Nm @ 5000 rpm
Transmission -- 4 Speed (All Down Shift)
Frame Aluminium perimeter frame Tubular single down tube with lower cradle frame
Saddle Saddle Height : 810 mm Saddle height : 812 mm
Headlamp -- 12V, 35/35W, HS1
LED Daytime Running Lights (DRL)
Tyres
Front 100/80 ZR 17" 2.75 X 17, 41 P - Tube Type, Semi-knobby
Rear 130/70 ZR 17" 3.00 X 17, 50 P - Tube Type, Semi-knobby
Wheel / RIM 6 split spoke wheel rim in lightweight alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 300 mm stainless steel disc
4-piston radial calipers
130 mm Drum
Rear 218 mm stainless steel disc
Single piston caliper
110 mm Drum with CBS
Suspension
Front Upside-down fork with 40 mm stanchions
Wheel travel: 110 mm
Hydraulic telescopic, 125 mm Travel
Rear Asymmetrical swingarm
Monoshock absorber with 130 mm wheel travel
100 mm wheel travel, SNS suspension
Colors Available
Colors -- Gloss Flame Red with Bright Red Decals
Matte Olive Green with Yellow Decals
Gloss Ebony Black with Blue Decals


Physical Specs
Length -- 1945 mm
Width -- 752 mm
Height -- 1072 mm
Weight -- 117 kg
Wheelbase -- 1235 mm
Ground Clearance -- 170 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14.5 litres 10.5 litres
Overview
About -- The Bajaj CT110 KS BS6 is a sturdy motorcycle with a well-designed frame that provides good sta Read More
Features Emissions Compliance : Euro 4
Electronic Management : AMP predisposition
Kadak Semi-knobby Tyres
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Economically priced making it an affordable option for many buyers.
- Fuel-efficient 115.45 cc engine, reducing running costs.
- Solid build quality ensuring durability and longevity.
- Comfortable riding experience thanks to effective suspension setup.
- Compact dimensions and lightweight for easy manoeuvrability in traffic.
- Semi-knobby tyres providing good road grip.
- Available in attractive colour options enhancing the aesthetic appeal.
Cons -- - Lacks a disc brake option which could have improved stopping power.
- Kick start feature may be inconvenient for some, as compared to an electric start.
- Engine performance might not be suitable for high-speed highway use.
- The all downshift 4-speed gearbox might take some getting used to.
- Absence of modern features such as a digital instrument console.
- The seat could be more comfortable for long journeys.
- Limited tank capacity might require frequent refuelling on longer rides.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7722