Yamaha Aerox 155

Compare Specifications of Aerox 155. Complete selection by adding one more.

Selected Bikes

Yamaha Aerox 155
Yamaha Aerox 155

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol
Engine Displacement 155.00 cc
Engine Liquid Cooled, 4-Stroke , SOHC, 4-valve
Engine Starting Electric
Engine Lubrication Forced Feed Lubrication Wet Sump
Clutch Dry, Centrifugal Automatic
Fuel System Fuel Injection
Ignition TCI
Cooling System Liquid Cooling
Maximum Power 15 PS @ 8000 RPM
Maximum Torque 13.9 Nm @ 6500 RPM
Transmission V-Belt automatic
Top Speed 120 kmph
Battery 12V,6.0 Ah
Display Fully digital anti-glare multifunction negative LCD
Frame Backbone
Headlamp LED
Taillamp LED
Mileage
Overall Mileage 45 kmpl
Tyres
Front 110/80-14M/C 53P Tubeless
Rear 140/70-14M/C 62P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy
Brakes
Front 230mm Hydraulic Single Disk brake with ABS
Rear 130 mm Mechanical Drum Brake
ABS Single channel ABS
Suspension
Front Telescopic fork
Inner tube diameter of front fork: 26.0 mm
Rear Unit Swing
Colors Available
Colors Metallic Silver
Metallic Black
Racing Blue
Grey Vermillion
Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition


Physical Specs
Length 1980 mm
Width 700 mm
Height 1150 mm
Weight 126 kg
Wheelbase 1350 mm
Ground Clearance 145 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 5.5 litres
Overview
About The Yamaha Aerox 155 is a sporty scooter that packs a punch with its 155.00 cc Liquid Cooled Read More
Features - Traction control system
- Multi-Function meter unit - Speedometer,Tachometer,Fuel meter,Fuel consumption indicator
- 24.5 L Under-Seat Storage
- Front Pocket with Power Socket
- Digital Clock auto adjust with smartphone connectivity
- Large Alloy Wheel 14
- Y-Connect (Smartphone Bluetooth Connectivity)
- Side stand engine cut-off switch
- Variable Valve Actuation (VVA)
- Smart Motor Generator(SMG) System
- Automatic Stop & Start System (SSS)
- V-belt replacement tripmeter
- Oil change tripmeter

User Comments
I am wating yamaha aerox 155
By Joyanta on 11-04-2019
Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7712