Triumph Bonneville Bobber 2021

Compare Specifications of Bonneville Bobber 2021. Complete selection by adding one more.

Selected Bikes

Triumph Bonneville Bobber 2021
Triumph Bonneville Bobber 2021

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol
Engine Displacement 1200.00 cc
Engine Liquid cooled, 8 valve, SOHC, 270° crank angle parallel twin
Engine Starting Electric
Clutch Wet, multi-plate torque assist clutch
Fuel System Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection
Maximum Power 78 PS / 76.9 bhp (57.5 kW) @ 6100 RPM
Maximum Torque 106 Nm @ 4000 RPM
Transmission 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain Final Drive: Chain
Top Speed 185 kmph
Display Analogue speedometer with LCD multi-functional display
Frame Tubular steel, twin cradle frame
Mileage
Overall Mileage 21 kmpl
Tyres
Front MT 90 B16
Rear 150/80 R16
Wheel / RIM Front Wheel: Wire 32-spoke, 16 x 2.5 inches
Rear Wheel: Wire 32-spoke, 16 x 3.5 inches
Brakes
Front Twin Ø310mm disc, Brembo 2-piston sliding axial calipers, ABS
Rear Single Ø255mm disc, Nissin single piston sliding axial caliper, ABS
Suspension
Front 47 mm Showa cartridge forks
Rear Mono-shock RSU with linkage
Colors Available
Colors MATT STORM GREY MATT IRONSTONE
CORDOVAN RED
JET BLACK


Physical Specs
Length --
Weight 251 kg
Handlebar Width 800
Seat Height 700
Wheelbase 1500 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres
Overview
About The price for Cordovan Red is ₹ 12,18,000.00 and the price for Matt Storm Grey Matt Ironstone Read More
Features - UPDATED HIGH TORQUE ENGINE
- DISTINCTIVE SOUNDTRACK
- DISTINCTIVE FLOATING SEAT
- NEW BLACKED OUT STYLE
- HIGHER SPEC BRAKES
Additional Details Exhaust : Brushed stainless steel 2 into 2 twin-skin exhaust system with brushed stainless silencers
Swingarm: Twin sided fabrication
Height Without Mirror: 1024 - 1055 mm
Rake: 25.4 º
Trail : 92.0 mm
Fuel Consumption : 60.9 mpg (4.6 l/100km)
CO2 Figures: 105 g/km EURO 5 CO2 emissions and fuel consumption data are measured according to regulation 168/2013/EC. Figures for fuel consumption are derived from specific test conditions and are for comparative purposes only. They may not reflect real driving results.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5979