KTM 890 Adventure 2023 vs Suzuki GSX S1000

Compare Specifications of 890 Adventure 2023 and Suzuki GSX S1000

Selected Bikes

KTM 890 Adventure 2023
KTM 890 Adventure 2023

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki GSX S1000
Suzuki GSX S1000

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 889.00 cc 999.00 cc
Engine 2-cylinder, 4-stroke, parallel twin 4-stroke, 4-cylinder, liquid-cooled, DOHC
Engine Starting Electric start Electric
Engine Lubrication Forced oil lubrication with 2 oil pumps Wet Sump
Clutch PASC antihopping clutch, mechanically operated Wet Multiplate
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection
Ignition -- Electronic ignition
Cooling System Liquid cooled with water/oil heat exchanger Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 103 Hp 145 bhp @ 10,000 rpm
Maximum Torque 100 Nm 106 Nm @ 9,500 rpm
Transmission 6-speed 6-speed constant mesh
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Battery -- Maintenance Free
Display TFT display --
Frame Chromium-Molybdenum-Steel frame using the engine as stressed element, powder coated Aluminium, Twin Spar
Chain 520 X-Ring --
Headlamp -- Halogen Bulb Type
Taillamp -- LED Tail Lamp
Mileage
Overall Mileage -- 14 kmpl
Tyres
Front -- 120/70ZR17M/C, Tubeless
Rear -- 190/50ZR17M/C, Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Spoke --
Brakes
Front 320 mm Disc ABS Twin disc
Rear 260 mm Disc ABS Disc
Suspension
Front WP APEX 43 (200mm travel) Inverted telescopic, coil spring, oil damped
Rear WP APEX - Monoshock (200mm travel) Link type, coil spring, oil damped
Colors Available
Colors Orange white
Orange black
Glass Sparkle Black Candy Daring Red and Metallic Triton Blue


Physical Specs
Length -- 2115 mm
Width -- 795 mm
Height -- 1079 mm
Seat Height 860 --
Ground Clearance 233 mm 139 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 20 litres 17 litres
Overview
About -- First introduced in Intermot Show. Read More
Features - High end steering damper
- Smartphone connectivity

Ktm 890 Adventure 2023
High end steering damper

Ktm 890 Adventure 2023
TFT Display
-3 Mode Traction Control
-Plush Ride
-Suzuki Easy Start System
Additional Details CO2 EMISSIONS : 110 g/km --

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9459