Husqvarna Svartpilen 401 2024 vs Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Compare Specifications of Svartpilen 401 2024 and Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna Svartpilen 401 2024
Husqvarna Svartpilen 401 2024

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue
Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 398.60 cc 346.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine Single Cylinder 4 Stroke, Air cooled,
Engine Starting Electric starter Kick
Engine Lubrication Forced oil lubrication with 2 oil pumps --
Clutch PASC antihopping clutch, mechanically operated --
Fuel System -- Constant Vacuum Carburettor
Cooling System Liquid cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 44 Ps 19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 28Nm @ 4000 rpm
Transmission 6-speed 5 Speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Riding Modes Street / Rain --
Frame Steel trellis frame, powder coated Single down tube
Chain 520 X-Ring --
Headlamp LED --
Mileage
Overall Mileage 29 kmpl --
Tyres
Front -- 90 / 90 - 19
Rear -- 110 / 80 - 18
Wheel / RIM -- Spoke
Brakes
Front ByBre, opposed four-piston caliper, brake 320 mm disc 280 mm ventilated disc, double piston caliper
Rear 240 mm Disc 240 mm ventilated disc, single piston caliper
ABS Bosch 9.3 MP (with cornering ABS and SUPERMOTO ABS) --
Suspension
Front WP APEX 43 35 mm forks, 130 mm travel
Rear WP APEX - Monoshock Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80mm travel
Colors Available
Colors -- Airborne Blue


Physical Specs
Length -- 2160 mm
Width -- 790 mm
Height -- 1090 mm
Weight 159 kg 192 kg
Seat Height 820 --
Wheelbase -- 1370 mm
Ground Clearance 180 mm 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13 litres 13.5 litres
Overview
About The 2024 Husqvarna Svartpilen 401 packs a punch with its 398.60 cc single-cylinder, 4-stroke en Read More Check the other variant
Read More
Features - Smartphone Connectivity
- 5 inch TFT Display
- Anti-theft
--
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Vibrant and unique aesthetic design
- Robust engine with good performance
- Comfortable ride quality with efficient suspension system
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety
Cons -- - Some riders might find the bike a bit heavy at 192 kg
- Fuel efficiency could be improved for city commute

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2987