Ferrari GTC4Lusso V8 T Petrol AT vs Mercedes-Benz G-Class G 63 AMG 4MATIC Petrol AT

Compare Specifications of GTC4Lusso V8 T Petrol AT and G-Class G 63 AMG 4MATIC Petrol AT

Selected Cars

Ferrari GTC4Lusso V8 T Petrol AT
Ferrari GTC4Lusso V8 T Petrol AT

Brand:

Model:

Mercedes-Benz G-Class G 63 AMG 4MATIC Petrol AT
Mercedes-Benz G-Class G 63 AMG 4MATIC Petrol AT

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 3855.00 cc 3982.00 cc
Engine 8 Cylinders 8 Cylinders
Clutch Dual Clutch --
Maximum Power 610 Ps @ 7500 Rpm 585 Ps @ 6000 Rpm
Maximum Torque 760 Nm @ 3000 Rpm 850 Nm @ 2500 Rpm
Transmission 7 Speed Automatic 9 Speed Automatic
Top Speed 320 kmph 220 kmph
Mileage
Overall Mileage -- 6.1 kmpl
Tyres
Front 245/35 ZR20 285/45 R21
Rear 295/35 ZR20 285/45 R21
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 398 x 38 mm Disc Ventilated Disc
Rear 360 x 32 mm Disc Ventilated Disc
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- Polar White
Obsidian Black
Rubellite Red
Mojave Silver
Brilliant Blue
Emerald Green
Selenite grey metallic
Magnetite black metallic
Iridium silver metallic


Physical Specs
Length 4922 mm 4817 mm
Width 1980 mm 1931 mm
Height 1383 mm 1969 mm
Weight -- 3200 kg
Kerb Weight 1865 2560
Wheelbase 2990 mm 2890 mm
Ground Clearance -- 238 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 91 litres 99 litres
Overview
Features - Airbags
- Tyre Pressure Monitoring System(TPMS)
- Seat Belt Warning
- Hill Hold Control
- Anti Lock Braking System
- Remote Central Locking
- Rear Parking Sensors
- Sunglass Holder
- Panoramic Sunroof
- Door Ajar Warning
- AMG Ride Control
- AMG high-performance breaking system
- Multibeam LED – trend-setting lighting technology
- AMG Performance steering wheel in nappa leather
- Glass sliding sunroof – more air, more light
- AMG Performance Steering wheel in nappa leather
- Seat Belt Warning
- 9 Airbags
- Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS)
- Hill Hold Control
- Remote Central Locking
- Front & Rear Parking Sensors
Additional Details Weight Distribution : 46% front - 54% rear
Boot Capacity : 450 L
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1927