TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 Fi Ethanol

Compare Specifications of Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 and Apache RTR 200 Fi Ethanol

Selected Bikes

TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0
TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0

Brand:

Model:

TVS Apache RTR 200 Fi Ethanol
TVS Apache RTR 200 Fi Ethanol

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 197.75 cc 200.00 cc
Engine SI, 4-stroke, Oil-cooled Single cylinder, four-stroke
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Start Electric Start
Clutch A-RT (Anti Reverse Torque) Slipper Clutch --
Fuel System Keihin CV Carburettor --
Ignition -- Twin-Spray- Twin-Port EFI
Cooling System Liquid-Cooled --
Maximum Power 20.5 PS @ 8500 rpm 21 PS @ 8500 rpm
Maximum Torque 18.1 ± 0.5 Nm @ 7000 ± 300 r 18.1 Nm @ 7000 rpm
Transmission 5 Speed Gear Box --
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 --
Top Speed 129 kmph 129 kmph
Battery 12V, 9Ah --
Frame Double Cradle Split Synchro STIFF --
Headlamp 60/55W, H4 Bulb with All-Day On LED Position Lamp --
Taillamp LED 2.5 W --
Tyres
Front 90/90-17" Tubeless 90/90-17
Rear 130/70-17" Tubeless 130/70-17
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc (270 mm Petal type) Disc
Rear Disc (240 mm Petal type) Drum
Suspension
Front Telescopic Forks Telescopic forks
Rear Mono Tube - Monoshock Mono Shock
Colors Available
Colors Black, Grey, Red, White and Matte Black --


Physical Specs
Length 2050 mm 2050 mm
Width 790 mm 790 mm
Height 1105 mm 1105 mm
Weight 149 kg --
Wheelbase 1353 mm 1353 mm
Ground Clearance 180 mm 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres --
Overview
About Check the newer variant
Read More
--
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Powerful performance with a top speed of 129 kmph
- Excellent handling and stability with a Double Cradle Split Synchro STIFF frame
- Unique A-RT Slipper Clutch technology for better gear downshifting
- Attractive design available in multiple color options
--
Cons - Price may be slightly high for budget-conscious buyers
- Fuel tank capacity could have been larger for long rides
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4107