TVS Apache RTR 165 RP vs UM Falcon 150

Compare Specifications of Apache RTR 165 RP and Falcon 150

Selected Bikes

TVS Apache RTR 165 RP
TVS Apache RTR 165 RP

Brand:

Model:

UM Falcon 150
UM Falcon 150

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 164.90 cc 150.00 cc
Engine SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled, SOHC,4 valves 1 Cylinder, 4 Stroke
Engine Starting Electric Electric / Kick
Clutch Wet multi plate RT slipper clutch 5 Speed With Clutch
Fuel System Fuel Injection: Bosch- Closed loop Carburator
Ignition -- CDI
Cooling System Oil cooler with Ram air assist AIR
Maximum Power 19.2 PS @10000 RPM --
Maximum Torque 14.2 NM @ 8750 RPM --
Transmission 5 speed gear box --
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 --
Top Speed 123 kmph --
Battery 12V, 8Ah MF --
Frame Double cradle Split Synchro Stiff Frame --
Headlamp AHO LED Headlamp with LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 90/90-17 49P Tubeless --
Rear 130/70 R17 M/C 62P Tubeless (Radial tyre) --
Brakes
Front 270mm Petal Disc Brake Disc
Rear 240 mm Petal Disc Brake Drum
Brake Lever Brake Fluid: DOT 3 / DOT 4 --
ABS Single Channel --
Suspension
Front Showa Race tuned Telescopic Forks Hydraulic Telescopic
Rear Showa Race tuned Mono Shock Dual Spiral Shock
Colors Available
Colors -- Red, Black, Blue


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm 2000 mm
Width 790 mm 710 mm
Height 1050 mm 1130 mm
Weight 148 kg 110 kg
Wheelbase 1357 mm 1260 mm
Ground Clearance 180 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres --
Overview
About The TVS Apache RTR 165 RP is a popular choice for motorcycle enthusiasts seeking an exhilaratin Read More --
Features - Race Performance Chassis
- Race Performance SHOW A Monoshock
- Race Born Cylinder Head
- Race Tuned Fuel Injection
- Dome- piston
- Race Tuned Slipper Clutch
- Valve train with Hi-Lift and Hi-Duration (HLHD) Cam
--
Additional Details Power to weight Ratio : 0.095 kW/kg
Muffler: Twin pipe and twin barrel design
--
Pros and Cons
Pros - Excellent power and torque figures
- Robust build quality and durability
- Comfortable for long rides
- High ground clearance
- Attractive price-point
--
Cons - Might feel heavy for novice riders
- Fuel economy could be better
- The aggressive design might not be to everyone's liking
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2380