TVS Apache RTR 160 4V vs UM Max II 150

Compare Specifications of Apache RTR 160 4V and Max II 150

Selected Bikes

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Brand:

Model:

UM Max II 150
UM Max II 150

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 159.70 cc 149.50 cc
Engine SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled 1 cylinder, 4 Stroke
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Start Electric / Kick
Engine Lubrication Forced wet sump --
Clutch Wet multi plate --
Fuel System Fuel Injection: Bosch- Closed loop / Carb: UCAL/ Keihin VE CT6[A] Carburettor
Ignition Mapped ignition system / TCI - Transistor Controlled Ignition CDI
Cooling System Oil cooler with Ram air assist Air cooling
Maximum Power 16.8 Ps @ 8000 rpm 12.54 hp @ 8500 rpm
Maximum Torque 14.8 Nm @ 6500 rpm 9.50 hp @ 7000 rpm
Transmission 5-Speed 5 speed with clutch
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 --
Battery 12V, 9Ah --
Frame Double cradle Split Synchro STIFF --
Headlamp AHO 12V, 60/55W H4 bulb, with all-time ON LED position lamp --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 90/90-17 49P Tubeless 2.50 x 18
Rear 130/70-17 M/C 62P Tubeless 3.00-18
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front Disc (270 mm Petal type) Disc
Rear Drum (130 mm)/ Disc (200 mm Petal type) Drum Type
Suspension
Front Telescopic Forks Telescopic hydraulic forks
Rear Monoshox Hydraulic and spring
Colors Available
Colors Red, Black and Blue Red Spyder, Super Stealth, Orange Madness, White


Physical Specs
Length 2050 mm 1980 mm
Width 790 mm 740 mm
Height 1050 mm 1050 mm
Weight 147 kg 80 kg
Wheelbase 1357 mm 1280 mm
Ground Clearance 180 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 2.77 litres
Overview
About Apache RTR 160 4V is the upgraded version of the original Apache RTR 160. From head to tail, th Read More --
Features -- Speedometer and tachometer system with good readability.
Blind spot mirrors.
Anti-Flat Sealant.
USB charging port.
Pros and Cons
Pros - Powerful engine with mapped ignition system
- Stylish design and LED lighting
- Comfortable suspension system
- Good fuel efficiency
- Great value for money
--
Cons - Slightly heavier than other bikes in its segment
- Non-ABS variant could be a drawback for some
- The seat could be more comfortable for long rides.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1366